Porn relationship news

The Jarics renew their contract with Falcon and Zack and Derek end theirs. Well it seems that the whole monogamous thing with the Jaric's has paid off with Falcon renewing their exclusive contract. That is really nice for them considering that they are both hotties and people seem to enjoy them working together. I guess that was not in the stars for Zack and Derek though. There was just to much hotness in that pairing anyway. It kind of makes you a little jealous and nauseous all at the same time to see two guys that hot together. Anyway this is porn we are talking about and the likely hood of a relationship lasting is seriously challenged. I can only hope for the best for those who are in relationships.


The truth is a relationship is hard enough without porn being involved. Just look around at your friends and see who are in relationships. With all of the speculation from gossip websites and that nefarious blogger who no one reads aside relationships are hard. With the high profile relationships of the likes of MJ taylor and Jason Pitt, the Jaric's and Zack and Derek they are fodder for the gossip blogs. Funny that Derek thought that he had to make a public announcement about wanting to keep the break up quiet. To tell the truth does it really matter?


People fall in and out of love on a regular basis Brent and Grant, Benjamin Bradley and Ethan Reynolds (whatever happened to Ethan?) Ben is back with Roman Heart last I heard, Pierre Fitch and Ralph Woods for example. The world did not come to an end when they broke up and we all survived and they did not feel the need to put out a press release. Oh and by the way a press release that also speaks of all of the new projects that they have coming up in the near future. I personally think it is a bit funny that Derek thought that it was necessary to to release this video.





So I guess with youtube and Twitter and all of the other places that you can upload video you can make anything seem news worthy. I think I will do a video to announce that I don't care.

This is elmysterio and I'm out

The evidence that matters is inconclusive.

With the cameras that can not be confirmed and the lack of DNA evidence it really is no wonder that the prosecution is going all out to make it look like Harlow is a hardened criminal. The Beach tapes and the Crab catcher tapes were their big hope of getting Harlow but the truth is Joe and Harlow knew they were being recorded. What is really interesting is the motive for all of this. Joe and Harlow killed Bryan to work with Sean and Cobra Video was their main competition in the gay porn business. Now the settlement did not preclude Sean from working with anyone but Cobra models. The only one named specifically was Brent Everett.

The settlement did have a stipulation that Sean would pay Cobra Video 20% of his fee for the use of the name "Brent Corrigan". Now the fact that Sean and Grant are claiming that they could not work with Joe and Harlow while they were in Las Vegas is strange because at the time there was no signed settlement. The settlement was not signed until the 18Th of January 2007. There were still issues with the settlement while they were in Las Vegas and they did not get ironed out until they were back in San Diego.

Also of note during the civil suit Sean and Grant said that the contract with Cobra could not be enforced. The contract in question that Sean breached would have expired in 2006 anyway. The civil suit was really about the name Brent Corrigan and nothing else. Bryan could not get that contract enforced because Sean could have fulfilled that contract by just showing up and that is all he had to do. You can not enforce a contract for sex, that would be prostitution and that is illegal. Also the production of pornographic material is illegal in the state of Pennsylvania.

Yet the prosecution is trying to use it as means for a conviction. They turned their back on the illegal activities of the victim until he was killed. All of a sudden he was a "business man" and he was killed so that someone could get his "prized actor". Give me a break, this is such a sack of shit. It stinks just like all of the other illegal activity that that court house is famous for. The truth of the matter is that Luzerne County should have removed themselves from prosecuting this case.

They do not have a definite time of death for the victim and every time it is reported it is a different time frame. As far as I am concerned the time frame is between 7:50pm and 8:20 pm on January 24Th. Based on the last time someone spoke to the victim and the time that Amy saw the car leave the scene. That gives the killers 30 minutes to kill Bryan and clean up and loot the house and flee the scene with the items that they are accused of taking. Did the police check the drain traps for blood trace? The killer would have been covered in blood based on the way that the victim was killed. Did they check to see how much blood the victim had lost during the autopsy? Did they check stomach contents of the victim, he supposedly got some food that day.

The police did not find any DNA evidence in the victims house or in the SUV that was rented by Harlow. They can not prove that the video cameras were in fact those of the victim. To tell you the truth they can not really prove that Joe and Harlow were actually at the victims house. That has always been the case. There is a witness sighting of the SUV from earlier that evening but it could that have been the Recon mission. As the email stated that Harlow was not scheduled to arrive until 7:15 pm. So unless Harlow was early then Macias is mistaken about 6:30 being the time that the "model" arrived.

Bryan was not expecting him until 45 minutes later. Perhaps it was just Bryan taking another phone call. Macias did talk to Bryan at 7:50 pm so Bryan was still alive at that time. There are just to many unanswered questions. No real proof that Joe and Harlow were at Bryan's house Just a vehicle that looked like the one Harlow rented. I wonder how many silver Nissan Exterra's there are out there? Did anyone actually see Harlow or Joe at the crime scene?
Is the knife found at the scene the one that Joe and Harlow purchased in Virginia Beach?

Why slash his throat they has a gun they could have shot him. It is January, its cold no one would have any windows open and most houses would have had double pained windows. No one would have heard the gun shot if you used a pillow to muffle it. Why would two crazed killers call Sean and Grant and tell them that they just killed someone. They must have known that Sean and Grant would be blamed for it. Non of this makes any sense to me, it never has.

The Case Of The Big Ass

Well this is funny Harlow is concerned about the size of his ass. It seems that a letter leaked to the press about Harlow and his fears about his image has made the rounds of the blogs today. With the Sword and Jim’s Silence of the chinchilla’s blog reporting on it. What is funny is that BB is alluding that I was the one who leaked this letter to the press. Now that is a total sack of shit if I ever heard one.

<Do these jeans make me look fat, do these panties make my ass look big>

First of all I never heard of that letter secondly it was sent to Renee Martin whom BB claims sent it to Damon Kruezer and me. Now I don’t know about any of you but Damon would have posted that letter in a hot minute if he received it. I on the other hand never received such a letter. So I guess BB was wrong, imagine that BB being wrong about something. Then PC decides to chime in about me being a party to such a scheme. PC who is all cozy with Renee and BB is accusing me of this?


I think PC is just pissed off because I won’t take his shit and call it like I see it. I made a comment on my blog yesterday and it seemed to set off a firestorm of controversy. I find it funny that I was always assumed to be in Harlow’s corner in all of this but that was far from the truth. I wanted the truth to come out and that is really all that I wanted from the very start. So this latest bit of "news" is really funny to me.



The idea that it could cause a mistrial is as big a joke as is the actual trial. It is full of lies and fabrications and too many people trying to cover their asses from the truth especially Harlow and his huge ass. Sean and Grant have lied from the beginning about their involvement in this murder. And Joe and Harlow were stupid to get involved in other people’s drama. I know a little bit about that subject as I was all involved in this drama and I am no longer falling for anybody’s bullshit.

my ass looks huge in this picture


Is it Just me are does Harlow's big ass make him look guilty?

At last the trial: part one

With the court house testimony under way it seems that the prosecution is going for blood. They are showing that this was a planned out methodical venture designed to get rid of Bryan Kocis who the defendent(s) deemed as direct competition to their gay porn business. The defense strategy is to place all of the blame on everyone but Harlow which I guess is what they should do. With Joe in prison for life and Harlow free to blame it all on him.

The prosecution has presented several witnesses who are truly making it appear that Harlow is not the sweet and innocent school boy his apperance suggests. As far the testimony of the coronor and the police officers they are stating facts that they have ascertained from the collection of evidence that was present at the crime scene. Most of which was destroyed by the fire from thier direct testimony.


Anderew Shunk testified that Joe and Harlow wanted to get Brent Corrigan to model for them because it would net them a big payday. He also testified that Harlow told him that Bryan Kocis was competition for their gay porn business. He also testified to the star power of Brent Corrigan, the prosecution refers to Brent Corrigan as the “Tom Cruise of gay porn” . Melnick also alluded to what was said at the Las Vegas dinner, He said that Joe and Harlow offered to kill Bryan for Sean and Grant.

The defense does not appear to have any strategy with regards to their cross-examinations on any of these witnesses so far though. I don’t really see any angle to the defense’s argument as of yet but this trial is just getting started. I guess we will just have to wait and see where they are going with this.


Now if you look at Andrew’s testimony it would appear that Brent Corrigan was the prize. Bryan stood in Joe and Harlow’s way of attaining of that prize. Hence the prosecutions premise that Bryan was in direct competition to them. There was also testimony offered to the subject matter discussed at the Las Vegas dinner that as far as we know there are two different versions of. The prosecution did not attend said dinner but they are using this as grounds for this murder. Now I don’t know about you but if you are going to kill someone do you tell someone who can testify against you about your plans?


There is also the testimony about how much Joe and Harlow were going to pay Brent Corrigan to do a couple of scenes. Andrew also testifies to the projected earning of the video scenes.

Now I have read the MOU and I don’t know all of the terms of the settlement but I do know that Brent was required to pay Bryan 20% for any work he did under the name Brent Corrigan. Now I really don’t know what Brent’s scene rate is but I would guess it is around $3000.00 per scene. So my question is why didn’t Brent take the $50,0000 and pay Bryan his share and be done with it.

That is the big question here, Bryan would be alive and Brent would be flush and Joe and Harlow would be happy. There is also the other question that I think needs to be answered why did Brent and Grant settle with Bryan. Bryan did not have a leg to stand on in the civil suit. It is a fact that Brent was under age when he worked on those first scenes for Cobra video. That is evident by the fact that they are no longer publicly available and by the fact that Brent’s age is no longer an issue. The settlement really makes no sense when you think about it. Brent walked away from Cobra Video in 2005 and he worked for Falcon studios as Fox Ryder. Bryan had no say in that endeavor.

Bryan did take out a trademark on the name Brent Corrigan but it was only in the state of Pennsylvania. The federal trademark had not been approved and to this day it still has not been approved. As far as the contract with Cobra Video goes it had no power to compel Brent to perform sex acts on film. No porn contract can compel a model to perform a sex act on film. The contract that Cobra had was useless in that aspect. So for the prosecution to claim that Brent Corrigan was under contract to Cobra video is a stupid mistake.

The tapes and what they revealed to me

Here is a little back story for you all about the days preceding the Crab Catcher and the Blacks Beach tapes. Joe sent me a email and he was kind of excited about the possibility of finally getting to work with Sean and Grant. Now from what I know and was told by Joe and a few others was that Joe and Harlow were sent an agreement of sorts from Sean and Grant to come to California and to film some scenes. Joe told me that they sent him a agreement . He wanted to send it to me, I told him that I did not want to see it but I told Joe to run it by his attorney Barry Taylor which he did do. Well I got confirmation that he did because of some stuff that I later heard with regards to the future trip. I also told Joe that this could very well be a trap and to be careful. Barry said the same and none of us wanted them to go. I guess we were right about it being a trap.

Now you must also keep in mind that I did not know at the time that they had actually gone to Pennsylvania or that Harlow had been to Bryan's house. There was talk in the papers of an alibi and I will admit that I believed it. During this period which was before the affidavit or the arrest there was very little solid evidence that pointed to Joe and Harlow that was public. And there were also those who were feeding me lies about the case.


This was also during the period that everyone was screaming about Sean’s age and that he lied to Bryan about being younger than he was, when in fact it was proven that he lied and said that he was older than he was. So Sean did star in underage porn and that pissed allot of people off. With that being a directive on the blogs and all of the back story about all of the other dealings between Lee and Bryan. Joe and Harlow were sort of put on the “Back burner”. Was this a plan by the prosecution? Also what was the deal with the name Drake? Where the hell did they come up with that one?


So I had no real issue with talking to them because I was always told that you are innocent until proven guilty. What I also found strange is that there was just so much misinformation out there. So to tell Joe and Harlow that I thought going to San Diego might be a trap was not in anyway aiding and abetting two known fugitives. It was just my gut reaction based on what had been going on in the prior months. Joe and Harlow's whole financial thing was a bit of a shock to me. They never mentioned it to me that they had money issues.

PC did mention Joe and Harlow’s financial situation in a IM conversation but at the time I did not know who PC was or if I could even trust him. I soon found out that I could not trust him. I did some checking on my own and did not see any major issues with their finances. But "someone" did run a credit check and found out the truth. That was something that I would not do just to get a story though.

I spoke to Joe and emailed him on several different occasions while they were in California. He was aware of the possibility of a wire, that is why he wanted to go to the nude beach. Now what I find interesting is that the day prior to the Blacks Beach trip at the Crab Catcher there were promises of fourth coming info into the murder. This never really happened though, they never said outright that they killed Bryan. There was allot of talk about Lee and his deal with Bryan but what is funny is that was already being talked about behind the scenes. Me and a few others who shall remain nameless already new about the backdoor deal between Lee and Bryan. Sean and Grant were aware of it as well at the time of the police intercepts.

The Beach Tapes and the Crab Catcher transcripts actually reveal very little that I did not already know. Most of what was talked about at the time I had discussed with other people close to the case prior to the beach tapes. So I guess for me it was just anticlimactic. What I find really interesting is that Sean and Grant could not be totally honest on the tapes because they did not want to blow they’re hand. By that I mean the whole line of questioning that was going on. I mean what the fuck were they thinking with that line of questions?

Joe was asking more questions than Grant ever did about Bryan and Lee and their dynamic. I don’t know if Joe was just fishing for info on Bryan or if he was trying to see how much Sean and Grant knew about Lee and Bryan’s deal. Joe's questions looked as if he was seeing if they really felt remorse about Bryan's death. I just don’t get it something is fishy here and it ain't the crab.

This I will tell you and I never really thought about it but when I spoke to Michael Gross about the Out Magazine article I mentioned info from several sources of what I had heard was going on in this case. At the time I don’t think he actually believed me but I guess if he looked at his notes he might see now that I was on the right track. I have been blogging about this case since February of 2007 and there are still aspects about this case that amaze me. After digging through all of the muck the truth is starting to loom ahead and it ain’t what any of you think it is.

This murder is still being covered by several bloggers and it still is Front page news when something new about the case is revealed. Now it seems that we are in the home stretch but there are still a few twists to come in this case and I don’t doubt some of you will be still shocked by them. The latest that is news is that Luzerne County has summoned Sean Macias the attorney for the victim to testify at the trial. One question is why was he not at the preliminary hearing when his testimony could have narrowed down the time of death issue?

I think I know why but that is for a different post.

This Elmysterio and I’m out.

Failed lies and misguided truths

BB is at it again in a attempt to draw attention from the real facts here. He is accusing me of being in on this murder from the beginning. Funny thing is I would think that he would keep that bit of information to himself as not to make himself look like a total fool. The real facts here are that BB and his lunatic rants are no more based in fact than anything that comes from the keyboard of Damon Kruezer. All of their statements are based on pipe dreams.

BB is on a constant loop talking about how "Cobrakiller"Grant did this murder. The fact of the matter is that it looks as if the police might just have the right people in jail. This is a fact that I find really interesting BB claims that he is always sending information to the authorities yet the fact is that it is not true. BB is just as mixed up in this murder case as he claims that I am. He is always screaming about Robert Wagner not being involved in any of this yet he is. Robert Wagner is a witness in this murder case.

Robert Wagner has what many have said is a weak alibi for the night of the murder. Phone records of the night of the murder will reveal the truth of Mr. Wagner's whereabouts. BB it seems that you can not ever back up any of your claims as to the who what and why of this murder. You just expose more of your hate and rage against Sean and Grant. Trying to intimidate me will not work because I have nothing to loose and you can not hurt me. I have no secret skeletons in my closet such as you. I have no reason to lie about anything anymore such as you.

All that was told to me has been exposed for what it is. Yet all that you claim is mere here say and not one fact that you can not prove in anyway what so ever. Why is it such a sensitive issue for you that Robert Wagner was at the house on the night of the murder. Why do you deny this with such anger and conviction. What does it matter to you BB as you have claimed that you did not know Bryan or Robert Wagner?

BB you have claimed that you were on the Juicygoo forums yet you went on a big hunt to get the transcripts from Damon Kruezer. Then you turn on him and attack him, why is that BB? You are no more than a mouthpiece for the biggest chunk of evil to ever walk the face of the earth yet you call me a puppet. Why are you trying to defend the vile perverts who are so trying to hide the truth about your dear beloved Bryan Kocis.

Is it out of fear that there really is a FBI investigation? Is it because of the crimes that were committed with regards to Cobra Video? Is it because of all of the underage models who passed in front of the Cobra Video cameras and the fact that Bryan did not have proper ID for any of the models? You claimed from the very beginning that Sean Lockhart was not under age. You said that the fake ID from the Rolling Stone article was his real ID. I guess you did not bank on the fact that I am from California and I know what the real ID of someone Sean's age would look like.

BB I know it must pain you to admit it but Sean is only 21 years old and when he made the first videos for Cobra Video he was in fact under age. Bryan knew this, Robert Wagner knew this yet they both perpetrated the lie that Sean had valid ID on file. But I guess they thought it would look official since Bryan paid for it. They were both dumb shits just like you to get involved in they're cover up issues.

The issues here are quite simple you think that because you keep using my name on your little blog that you are upsetting me well the fact is it is quite liberating. I don't have to worry about what I say anymore for fear that someone may get upset with me and spill the beans on me.
PC tried it, it went really well for him, Rob tried it with similar results and so did a few others. But your always a day late and a dollar short. You have tried it and you actually linked it to the one post on my blog that almost made you pee your pants.

The one with all of the lovely comments about you from all of the people who read the post who said such glowing things about you. Take a trip down memory lane BB and enjoy what your fans wrote about you on that post I know I sure did. Just so you know this is still my blog and I will write what I want to write about and no one can tell me otherwise.

This is Elmysterio opps I mean Cedric Harris and I'm out bitches

Joe and the truth

Well it appears that Joe Kerekes has spilled the beans on his plan to turn on Harlow Cuadra. Joe has spoken to several jail-mates and told them all about how Harlow killed Bryan Kocis. What I find interesting is that Joe has told so many different stories that it is hard to follow them. Joe claims that Harlow planned this whole thing and that he was just along for the ride. Joe also claims that during the murder he was at the motel surfing the Internet or was he in the car waiting for Harlow. From my perspective it appears that Joe is trying his level best to cause confusion in this murder case. His court room outbursts not withstanding.

First of all on my blog Joe states that he is not Mark but the fact is I knew who he was all along. He was MJT or Mark Joe and Trent. Joe contacted me through Email about a picture that I had of Harlow on my blog that he wanted changed. The date of our first email was Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:58 AM. Contrary to the beliefs of certain bloggers that was our first contact other than his regular rants on my blog. As far as I am concerned with this case my motivation was to just write about it, no more no less. It seemed to take on a life of its own with the attacks and the fighting and blame throwing and it just got ugly.

The sad fact is that a man was murdered and several lives will be forever changed by that fact. Not withstanding that the victim of this murder had already ruined several lives with his bogus legal suits and his lies and his unscrupulous business practices. The fact is that Bryan Kocis was not a nice person and he was willing to do anything to destroy "Brent Corrigan" speaks volumes to his character. Dirty underhanded deals, public smear campaigns, bogus lawsuits, underage porn and child molestation all speak to his character.

Joe and Harlow were not the brightest couple in the world and I don’t think that they should have ever got involved in any of this but that is my opinion. The fact that Sean and Grant were having problems with Bryan was enough for me to know that I would have just avoided the whole situation if I were Joe and Harlow. But then again who knows what they were thinking. Fast cash in the porn industry is a joke but I guess Joe and Harlow were not aware of that.

The fact that I got involved in this whole debacle is something that I do not regret. I have been accused of aiding and abetting two criminals, illegal phone conversations, possession of stolen property and various other crimes by someone who claims to be on the inside of this investigation. I just want to thank PC for posting the arrest warrant that shows that I did not aid and abet two known fugitives. I would also like to thank Jim for confirming the first contact that I had with Joe and Harlow.

Now I do not believe that Barry Taylor was one of Joe and Harlow’s clients. The fact that if he were it would be grounds for his disbarment. I also really don’t understand why Joe would tell complete strangers about his part in this murder other than to gain some street cred in the jail. His claims of being straight and doing this for money and the privilege it provides are in my opinion is a bunch of crap. Joe has lied to the police on several occasions and I think that is his defense. "You can not believe a damn thing I say so I must not be guilty".


Harlow on the other hand has said very little about the case and in the few times that we have spoken after his arrest he has stated the same thing and he has never wavered on that one bit. Do I believe him well that I will just keep to myself as I am not on the jury and it really does not matter what I believe. You all can believe what ever you want and you can spout off about it as well. Just an small note to all of you who think that I am involved in this in any other way other than my blog you are sadly mistaken.

I am still waiting for the truth to be revealed and from what has been posted as relevant to this case it is not the truth. It is just pure speculation, the police are still grasping for a reason as to the why Bryan was killed. The evidence presented so far is purely circumstantial. The beach tapes are in my opinion a joke and it will backfire. The so-called involvement of several of the people mentioned on other blogs that is a joke as well.


Joe and Harlow were aware of the "trap" that was set by the FBI and all of the other police agencies with regards to the beach tapes. They were also aware of the whereabouts of the missing Maserati, as was I long before the beach tapes were made.
This case is really just becoming a joke, a comedy of errors and it will all play out in the fabulous Luzerne County court system which I might add is the biggest joke of them all. There have been claims that Robert Wagner was at Bryan’s house on the night he was murdered and I for one do not know if that is true but some seem to think so and that would explain the constant attacks on BB. I would like to think that BB is not involved and he is being attacked because he is not in agreement with the party line. BB is of the belief that Sean and Grant had something to do with this murder. That is what BB believes and I’m fine with that.

Do I think that Sean and Grant had anything to do with this murder? The answer would be yes. They contacted Joe and Harlow and invited them to Vegas. Joe and Harlow took them out to dinner where the subject of Bryan came up. Now common sense would lead you to believe that Joe and Harlow did not just bring up the subject of Bryan. That would have been Sean and Grant. Their deceitful partner Lee Bergeron was suckering Sean and Grant into a bad deal with Bryan. They were most likely pissed off about the pending deal and voiced there opinion about it to Joe and Harlow.

I don’t know who brought up the subject about making Bryan disappear and I don’t doubt it was brought up. I was not there so I can not attest to who came up with that idea. But for Joe and Harlow to just come out of the blue with something like that is a bit of a stretch. They did not even know Bryan or have any prior contact with the man. Sean and Grant did have prior contact with him and made their animosity well known.

Now as far as Joe and Harlow devising a plot to do away with Bryan on a promise to work with Sean that is a bit of a stretch. Bryan was not a threat to their business and the claim that they did all of this to work with "Brent Corrigan" is a stretch as well. Brent Corrigan is a commodity in porn but he is not the only hot twink out there. As far as Sean and Grant’s involvement in this murder, it is guilt by association. They know the accused and they knew the victim and the are a crucial link in the theory of the police as to why Bryan was killed.

I don’t think the truth will ever be known because there are just to many lies out there and not enough credible witnesses to make the truth available. The police have a theory and it seems that they will make the evidence work with that theory. The fact is that the evidence presented thus far has to prove the guilt of the accused. It could very well do just that but then again it could all be disproved. Did Harlow snap and kill Bryan? Did Joe kill Bryan? Was Bryan dead when Harlow arrived? Was Joe at the motel? Was Robert Wagner at Bryan’s house on the night he was murdered? This is for the courts to decide and I am more than willing to let them do they’re job with regards to that.

With all of the negative press on the courts of Luzerne County I do think that this will be a fair trail as they are being watched by the FBI. The Fed’s want this case over as soon as possible because of their investigation into Bryan’s other dealings. They want Robert Wagner so bad that they can taste it. Bryan had been under investigation for several months prior to his murder and that is why this case had so many different police agencies involved. There are those who deny this but the facts of this investigation prove otherwise.


This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

Prodigy Pictures is on the rise.

Brent Corrigan AKA Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy have finally got a good business partner to help them Get there company Prodgy Pictures off the ground. With the new infusion of cash and expertise they seem to be on they're way to a successful venture. I Have been a fan of Dink Flamingo for quite sometime and I can see that he is going to help Sean and Grant achieve what they have been trying to achieve for quite sometime.

No thanks to Lee bergeron and all of the others who have tried to destroy his asperations Sean has made two new videos the Porne Ultimatum and Brent Corrigans Summit and they are both due to be relesed this month if all goes well. I have also read on his web-site that he is soon to be in paradise filming his next epic. I have not seen his first effort and don't really know if I will but I do wish him the best of luck. It has been a rough couple of years for him.

I just thought that I would get the truth out there before the Internet Maggot got his smelly fingers all over it. Seems he is setting up a new big lie to tell the world but we all know he does not know a damn thing about this.

This is Elmysterio and I'm out.

The 385

With 385 potential witnesses who seem to be at the beck and call of the prosecution in the Kocis case willing to testify to the whereabouts of Joe Kerekes on the night of January 24th 2007. It would seem that Joe does not stand a chance at defending himself against the allegations that he is charged with. It would appear that Luzerne County has him dead to rights. I guess Joe was on Bryan’s web cam and this can be proven by the prosecution. You know the same web cam that Robert Wagner witnessed Bryan’s murder on. It is really to bad that the desk clerk at the hotel could not ID Joe at the preliminary hearing.

As for his criminal record it would appear that Joe is a bad driver and he should be kept off the road, as he is a serial speeder with tinted windows. Harlow’s criminal record is just as bad as Joe’s is with the exception that Harlow is a serial masseuse. With Joe and Harlow’s serious criminal records it seems that what the prosecution claims would be a stretch. But the prosecution seems to think that two people who have no record of violent crime would travel to Pennsylvania and commit this crime unprovoked. The police claim that this is the motive."Investigators claim the two Virginia men killed Kocis, their rival in the gay porn industry, inside his home and then set the house on fire. Kocis, 44, was found dead by firefighters".

Some seem to think that Joe and Harlow had a large debt load that this was a good reason for them to commit this crime. They also feel that Joe and Harlow thought that Sean Lockhart would be their financial savior. These same people seem to think that Joe and Harlow were under the impression that getting Sean to work for their web-site would help them make a wad of cash. This I find interesting because Joe and Harlow would have to produce a video with Sean and get it distributed to make this wad of cash. A video that would take weeks to months to get put on the market and it is not even a sure thing that anyone would really even want to see it.
For the record Harlow has never publicly admitted he was at Bryan’s house and from what we have been told the police have no solid evidence to prove otherwise. As far as public statements made by Harlow there really have not been any. As far as we know the only thing that says that Harlow was ever at Bryan’s house are the Blacks Beach tapes. From what I gather from the comments on the blogs is that Harlow is a known liar. So I guess we can not believe anything that he says. This is proven in the letters that he sent to Damon and the alibi that he claimed he had. So why would you believe what he said on those beach tapes?

The prosecution seems to be a little pissed off that Harlow finally has a good attorney and now they want to take that away from him by filing this latest motion. Funny thing is that it would seem that Joe’s attorneys would be the ones filing this motion not the prosecution. I guess the prosecution wants to make sure that Joe has a fair trial. It makes you wonder what Melnick is thinking. Is he that scared that his reputation will be smeared again by Fannick. You would think that with 385 potential witnesses Melnick would have a sure thing when it comes to a guilty verdict. But I guess they want the state of Pennsylvania to foot the bill for Harlow's attorney? Maybe so they can wrap this up in a nice little package like they did with the other case that concerned Bryan Kocis.

With all of the evidence that the prosecution is claiming you would think that they would not resort to dirty tricks but I guess that just shows that the case against Joe and Harlow is not as strong as they are claiming. As far as I am concerned the case is not as clear-cut as some would think. With all of the evidence that it would seem that Sean Lockhart had against Bryan I find it strange that Bryan was not arrested. If Sean went to the FBI on the four occasions that I was told of why did they not take any action against him. With the email threats and the civil suit and all of the other underhanded things that Bryan did to Sean and Grant it would seem that they would have taken Sean’s accusations seriously.

It is clear that Bryan wanted to control Sean and make his life a living hell. That has been proven with the backdoor deal between he and Lee Bergeron. Bryan went as far as to get a separate Cobra Video just to file the civil suit against Sean and Grant. It appears that Bryan seemed to have some sort of hold on the FBI for them not to take Sean’s case seriously. Bryan also must have had some sort of hold over the head of the Luzerne County Judicial system as well for his prior case to be basically dismissed. Why would Judge Connahan not require him to register as a sex offender when he videotaped himself having sex with a 15 year-old boy?

The defense that Bryan used was that the boy lied to him about his age. Bryan also claimed he was going to use the 15 year-old in a video for his company. He claimed that he filmed him and he "forgot" to get the boys ID. Which I might add it is against the law to film a model without having valid records of the age of the model on file (US 2257). But apparently that never stopped Bryan before. By the way all of these claims were made against a company that at the time did not even exist. There are several people who would have a valid reason to kill Bryan Kocis as he was not a nice person. He was a gambler and a child molester and he was a liar. Who knows why he was killed the fact is that he was but it has still not been proven as to when he was killed. The Coroner can not confirm time of death, just how he was killed. They are still not even positive as to the murder weapon.

I have been accused of all types of things with regards to this case. Funny thing is most of the stuff that I have been accused of saying is stuff that I have read in the newspapers. So I guess I am using a bad resource for my information. But I was told that the newspapers were a good source information. You know with all of the things that I am accused of saying I just find it funny that some are trying to attribute all of this to me. I guess they are just so intent on spreading lies about everything regarding this case that they need to pin the blame on someone. Did Joe and Harlow have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. Did Sean and Grant have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. As far as I am concerned this is a circumstantial case and it always has been, nothing more nothing less.

This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

Black Helicopters and other conspiracy theories:

So let me get this all straight the prosecution want us to believe this is what really happened:

Sean and Grant contact Joe and Harlow. Grant thinks Harlow would be a great fit to work with Sean on their web-site. But Joe and Harlow also think that Sean is a hot property and they offer Sean a huge sum of money to work for their web-site but Sean turns them down because it is to good to be true. So which is it? But then Sean and Grant invite Joe and Harlow to Las Vegas where Joe and Harlow take them out to dinner and Drop 3 large on the feast.
The subject of Bryan is brought up and they discuss how he has been in the way of Sean and Grant’s success and how at every turn Bryan was there to stop them from doing what they wanted to do.

Somehow the subject turns to what can be done about Bryan and Joe and Harlow are said to make an offer to kill him. Sean and Grant decline that offer and assume that Joe and Harlow do the same. But unbeknownst to Sean and Grant, Joe and Harlow secretly hatch a plan and tell several people about their plan to do away with Bryan and to make Sean an indentured sex slave for they’re boydelo. As we all know Sean has no say in the matter because he is so easily controlled. Bryan can attest to that, he could totally control Sean. That was proven by the ironclad contract that he had with Sean. Oh wait Sean broke that contract and took the car that Bryan purchased for him and did not fulfill his obligations. Oh wait I’m going off subject here, so back to Joe and Harlow.

They fly back to Virginia and put their plot in into motion. They send out an email to all of the subscribers of their web-site announcing their new deal with Sean/Brent and the new distribution deal in the works. They tell informant number 1 and Justin Hensley Informant #2 that they really want to work with Sean and that mean old Bryan won’t let them. In the three days prior to the murder their plan to do away with Bryan is put in to motion. Because Bryan has so much control of Brent/Sean and they really must work with him because of their so-called dire financial situation. So they hatch a plan to go to Pennsylvania to kill him and destroy all of the Cobra Video records and to still a Rolex watch so that they will now have 6 of them and to steal some video cameras.

They get a throw away phone to only be used to call Bryan and they buy a knife and a gun but they don’t use them and they rent a car which they use because they don’t want to drive one of their fancy cars to Pennsylvania in the dead of winter. You know the salted roads can be hell on your fancy car. They also create an email account only to be used to email Bryan and they get a background report done on Bryan as well as email him their pictures. They go to visit Bryan a man they have never met before and kill him in cold blood because he is in the way of them working with the biggest prize in porn. Then they burn his house to hide the fact that they were ever there and they call Sean the day after to say look at what has happened. And claim that “I guess my guy went a little crazy”. Then they send some threatening messages to Sean and Grant about the deal they supposedly had.

But they seem to have forgot that they told a few people about they’re plan and now they have to run and hide in Florida while they tell everyone that they are in Hawaii. They post on several blogs that they are innocent and they talk to the newspapers and deny that they knew the victim and they say that they were in Virginia at the time of his death. While the whole time they are trying to recruit people to lie about their whereabouts. Then they have the audacity to make a video about their meeting with “Drake” the supposed killer of the victim. Then to top it all off they get a contract sent to them by Sean and Grant to work together and they fly to San Diego and tell Sean and Grant all about their exploits and how they witness Bryan get killed. And they apologize to Sean and Grant for the trouble that they caused them.

Then they get arrested and proclaim their innocence and are extradited to Pennsylvania and the first thing that Joe says when they arrive is that Harlow went to the house alone while he was in the motel room surfing the Internet. And Harlow claims he did not do it and that Bryan was dead when he arrived at his house.

This all makes perfect sense to me if they are crazed killers and mentally defective. The fact that they tell several people about their plan to kill a man that they have never met just to work with a twink porn star. They are by all means mentally defective if they thought this plan would work. Does anyone else see this? You have to be a special kind of stupid to think you will get away with a crime this stupid.

Did I get all this right?


So let’s recap:

1: They tell two people who live with them that they are going to Pennsylvania to kill Bryan. And they also tell them they want to work with Brent Corrigan/ Sean Lockhart one of the models of Bryan Kocis’s Cobra Video and that Bryan is in the way of them doing so. And it is assumed that they must kill him.

2: They have dinner with the model Sean Lockhart and his boyfriend Grant Roy who they want to work with and they discuss killing Sean's boss to do so.

3: They send out an email to their web subscribers announcing that they are going to be working with Brent Corrigan. (This model is said to be under contract with Cobra Video. But the contract that was in place at the time of the murder was not exclusive and Sean/Brent could in fact work with other models with the exception of any Cobra model and he could also work for other studios. The contract that he had prior to the settlement was voided when Sean Lockhart breached it in September 2005. That is why there was a settlement.)

4: They create a fake email account get a Internet background check on the victim and send him their pictures and get a throwaway phone and buy weapons and rent a car all using their own credit card and rent a room in Pennsylvania using their drivers license.

5: They do all of this in the hopes that they will get away with killing someone whom they have never met just to get the opportunity to work with Brent/ Sean and make millions.

6: And to top it all off they attempt to burn down the victim’s house to destroy all of the evidence. But they cant resist and steal two cameras and a Rolex watch as souvenirs and take them back to Virginia and leave them in their own house for the police to find when they search it. They did all of this thinking that they would get away with murder.

In Summary:
Now I don’t know about any of you all out there but to me this sounds like someone who could just be a little crazy. A psychiatric evaluation is really not out of the question here.

If all of what the DA in Luzerne County is claiming to be true then they must be certifiable and therefore can not be put to death. But he has filed a petition for the death penalty in this case so he must think that they are not crazy. So what is it? Is this in fact what they did or is it just a trumped up case with a bunch of circumstantial evidence made to fit the crime? Is there a simpler reason why they went to Pennsylvania?

To me it looks like the DA has truly upped the ante on his burden of proof with all of these allegations.
It would appear that he now must prove that they planned this and that in the planning of all of this they were sane individuals.

The reason the DA is trying to prove that they had someone lie about there whereabouts on the night in question is to prove that they had the fore thought to get people to lie for them in the process of this crime and it would go to show that they were sane and that they knew it was wrong.

There must be some reason for this murder other than what the prosecution is claiming. The motive in all of this will only work if those accused were in fact crazy at the time this crime was committed.

My opinion

From what I have discerned from all of this is that Harlow wanted to work with Sean and he could do this with Cobra Video. He did not want Bryan to know about his link to Boybatter and escorting. The reason for this was because of the trick that Sean and Grant played on Bryan in Las Vegas. Using Boybatter as a point of leverage in the negotiations with Bryan. They did this for a better settlement deal and it apparently worked. So Harlow and Joe decided that they would create a false name. That is how Danny Moilin was born. So now that we have that out of the way Harlow/Danny sends an application to Cobra Video with his pictures attached. He goes out and buys a throwaway phone to contact Bryan and he creates a fake email account. All of this to maintain the secrecy of who he really is. All is well so far and contact is made and Bryan and Danny agree to meet.

Joe and Harlow go to the pawnshop and buy a gun and a knife. This might have been done for any number of reasons none of which I know other than Joe was a collector of such. They also do an Internet check on Bryan. I will not try to guess as to why they did that either only to say that if any of what Sean and Grant might have told them made them want to do so.

They rent a car and drive to Pennsylvania and stay in a motel and register under Joe’s name. They are in contact with Bryan via phone and email several times during these three days. Harlow’s original appointment was set for a earlier time but Bryan called him and changed it to a later time as he was having meetings and he would not be available until later in the evening.

Harlow is said to have arrived at Bryan’s sometime either just before 8:00PM or shortly thereafter and he says that when he arrived he saw that the front door was slightly opened and he called Bryan’s name and went in. He said that he saw that Bryan was dead on the couch and he heard someone upstairs and that they were about to come downstairs and he panicked fled the scene.

Now from phone records we have Bryan talking to his attorney at 7:50PM for the last time and it is assumed that he was still alive. Harlow is logging into his email account at 8:06PM, where was he when this occurred. And from witness testimony we have Harlow leaving the house at 8:20PM and the fire being reported at 8:34PM and the fire department arriving about 10 minutes later.

So what we have is about a 20-30 minute time frame for all of this to have happened. The crucial thing is when did Harlow arrive and who was in the house besides Bryan. As the affidavit says Harlow was logging into his email at 8:06PM. Was he at Bryan’s house when he did that or had he not arrived yet? If Harlow was not at the house @ 8:06PM then that cuts the time available for him to have done all of this down to just minutes. Ip records and Cell tower pings will show this. If Harlow arrived as he has said and Bryan was dead then this case has gone in the wrong direction from the beginning. As I have said all along that the burden of proof in all of this is on the prosecution and the facts to me just don’t add up and Joe and Harlow are innocent until proven guilty.

As far as conspiracy theories go there really are none other than a “rush” to justice, which I might add is really a slow rush. The police and the prosecution have done their level best to make their case work with the evidence that they have but to me it just does not jell. I think once we go to court and all of the evidence is presented it will become quite obvious that something is really wrong with all of this.

This is Elmysterio and I'm out

Deceptions

Why would someone post some of the horrid things that I have seen posted on some of the blogs? This is all in regards to the senseless death of a human being? Why would some revel in the misfortune of those who are accused of said crime? It really makes we wonder what the world is coming to. The police knew that the victim was a not a well-liked person so I guess to make the charges stick they had to vilify those who are accused of killing him.

When I first read about the murder of Bryan Kocis almost 10 months ago I thought to myself, oh my god this is horrible. I thought some deranged fan of Sean Lockhart might have done this. My next thought was that Sean was in danger from this crazy obsessed fan. Then I started to read all of the supposed theories of the other bloggers and thought that some were plausible and some were not. As we moved forward and more information surfaced and we had to dig through it all to get at the truth that original thought I had was changed.

Now I know that Bryan Kocis was no angel but the way he was killed showed that someone hated him with a passion that caused me to take pause. When you think of the way he was killed he would have died almost instantly yet someone was filled with so much rage that they stabbed his dead body 28 additional times. To me that shows that who ever killed him was not satisfied with the fact that he was dead and felt that he did not suffer enough. The fact that he was stabbed 28 more times alone speaks to rage of the killer. The way he was killed made me think of the O.J. Simpson case. The only thing that still has me puzzled was the lack of defensive wounds on the victim. Was Bryan incapacitated when he was killed? Did his killer surprise him? Was there more than one person involved?

From the arrest affidavit we have probable cause to believe that those who are accused of this might have done this. But the reason for them doing this still leaves me perplexed. They kill him to work with one of his models? Now I don’t know about any of you out there but Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and you can not own another human being in the United States of America. So in effect Bryan Kocis really had no hold on Sean Lockhart. So what was there to stop Sean from working with anyone he wanted to work with? Why would Joe and Harlow kill a man they did not even know to work with Sean Lockhart? If you were Sean would you want to work with someone who had just killed someone in cold blood? So that just makes no sense to me all around.

The other thing that I find interesting is that Bryan sued Sean for breach of contract and cyber-squatting because he used his stage name "Brent Corrigan" on an Internet web-site. Now this brings to mind two things that I find interesting.

1: Bryan filed for a trademark on the name Brent Corrigan and the images of that persona. What purpose would it serve Bryan to own that name? It is not like he was going to use it for himself as a stage name or for another model. The name itself was attached to a living person and would be virtually useless too Bryan as Sean Lockhart was the person that the name was attached to. The fact that Sean filmed the Velvet Mafia under a different name should have shown Bryan that.

2: The contract that Sean broke with Cobra Video was non-binding as you can not require someone to perform a sex act on film, video or in the privacy of your own home. Because forced sex is considered rape and payment for such is prostitution and that is illegal.

So what was the civil suit all about? The fact that Cobra Video was in fact two different entities, one from Pennsylvania formed in late 2001 and the other from Delaware formed in 2005 and from what I have been able to decipher they were independent of each other. To me it looks like Bryan was hedging his bets when he sued Sean and Grant with the newly formed in 2005 Delaware entity of Cobra Video. The funny thing is the Pennsylvania version of Cobra Video was the one that held the trademark on the name "Brent Corrigan" and they also had the broken contract as well. So the lawsuit was suspect at best. Also during this period Bryan's earlier conviction was changed to corruption of a minor. This was so he was not required to register as a sex offender.

The other thing that is disturbing is the fact that Bryan was going to buy out Lee Bergeron's Share of LSG Media of which Lee was the principle shareholder, thus making Bryan the principle in a company that he was suing. Now from what I have gathered Lee was not mentioned in the original civil suit. Bryan was going after Sean and Grant on all fronts. Sean had threatened to drop the name Brent Corrigan so Bryan would have no hold on him. So he went after the company that Sean was part owner of. What I also find interesting is that there has never been another case that I know of where a model was sued by a porn producer. I guess Bryan just did not want to loose.

What was Bryan’s fascination with a model that wanted nothing to do with him? Was Bryan in love with Sean or did he just want to destroy him? From where I sit it looks like destruction was his goal. Sean had too much information against Bryan for him to just let him go. Bryan was aware of Sean’s age fraud from early on and he apparently did not care. He was aware of the forged age documents and he had Robert Wagner witness them making him a party to that fraud.

With the bogus lawsuit he filed he made his attorney possibly a party to that fraud when he lied and sued LSG Media with a company that did not even exist when the contract was broken or the age fraud occurred. What was the purpose of all of this? Al Flora, his attorney when he was charged with having sex and filming it with an underage boy was also a possible party to his fraud when he claimed that the model he was filming was for his Video Company, which at the time did not yet exist. And he did not yet have his valid ID on record. And Bryan’s claim that the boy lied about his age would have made any another video producer more diligent in his 2257 record keeping with regards to the types of boys he filmed. From what I have gathered companies do not film they’re models until they have proof on file for them. And from statements from people, who knew Bryan, they claimed that Cobra was more of a hobby than a business for him. That would explain the hundreds of videotapes seized when he was arrested. Bryan liked to film boys having sex as a hobby and he did this before he had a company to produce these videos.

Why all the fraud from this one man who the police claim was a businessman. Some business he ran, he filed for bankruptcy in 2002 because of a failed cellular phone business venture with his sister. Who he sued because she wanted nothing to do with him after he was arrested for molesting that fifteen year-old boy and he plead guilty. Then he starts a porn venture when he was for all intensive purposes broke. He files for a Limited liability company in Pennsylvania and says that he is the sole proprietor of it.

So in effect he started his company and said he was the sole owner is suspicious in the fact that it was done to cover the lie that he told his attorney; his claim that he was filming those boys for his video company. From what I have gathered the business he ran was illegal in the state of Pennsylvania. That is correct it is against the law to produce pornography in the state of Pennsylvania. Yet Bryan did it from the basement of his house in a residential neighborhood for 6 years. I guess he had connections to the right people. The fact that he was caught on videotape having sex with that 15 year-old boy and he was not subject to Megan’s law says a lot about the legal system in PA.

So let’s recap: Bryan was broke he filed Bankruptcy, he filed as a sole proprietor for a video pornography business in Pennsylvania. That business was an illegal operation in that state. He sued his sister for a failed business attempt. And molested a fifteen year-old boy and plead guilty and was not required to register as a sex offender. Looks like 2001 was a banner year for Bryan Kocis. All of these things still do not justify his being killed in the way that he was. It does make you wonder how many people would have a motive to do it though.

Now Joe and Harlow were brought into all of this because of Sean and Grant. They were used as a point of leverage against Bryan. They were used to get a better deal on the settlement that LSG Media was working on with Bryan and Cobra Video. Once all things with Cobra were settled Joe and Harlow were told that they could not work together because of the contract with Cobra Video. Yes that was a dirty deal but I guess that’s how you do business in the porn world. The fact that Sean had broken his contract with Cobra 18 months prior to all of this not withstanding it was a good excuse for Sean and Grant to get rid of Joe and Harlow.

Funny thing is Sean introduced Harlow to Bryan and Falcon Studios. Now from what I have been told Harlow wanted to work with Sean and he went to Cobra Video to do so. Sean was "required" as part of the settlement to film a certain amount of video scenes to fulfill his obligation with regards to the settlement. Harlow wanted to put his image out there with "Brent Corrigan" and when Sean’s obligation was filled with Cobra they could work together at their respective companies and Sean could use the name Brent Corrigan.

Now the settlement forbid Sean to work with any other Cobra models out side of a Cobra production. But Danny Moilin was not a real person and Bryan would have no recourse against him. If Bryan tried to pull the same tricks he pulled with Sean it would be the end of him because he was not diligent with his 2257 records. That could possibly close down Cobra Video. Even if Danny worked as Harlow, Bryan would have no recourse because Harlow was his real name and Bryan could not trademark it and it is a proven fact that Harlow had used that name before.

Now here’s were it gets sticky Robert Wagner was a witness to the age fraud with regards to Sean Lockhart and possible other models. The fact that Sean Lockhart had gone to the FBI on several occasions to report that he was underage when he worked for Cobra Video would have caused Robert some very serious legal problems had the FBI taken Sean’s claims seriously. There is also the question of whether the FBI had Bryan under investigation for producing underage porn. All of this was a good reason for Robert Wagner to be worried. Could this have been a motive for murder???

Now Robert was in effect Bryan’s right hand man and he was diligent in his research of Sean Lockhart. He knew who Harlow was because his picture was on Sean’s deleted Myspace page. That would be where Robert would have seen his picture and put 2+2 together and made the whole plan work. He would vet Harlow to Bryan as Danny and set up the interview and thus set up Harlow for the murder of Bryan Kocis. He would send himself the email with the pictures and send Sean an email saying that Bryan had a new model for him to work with. All of this was done while he was pretending to be Bryan.

Now I have said in a previous post that the coroner could not accurately determine the time of death of Bryan Kocis due to the subsequent fire. That alone could acquit Joe and Harlow and destroy Roberts alibi if serious doubt is placed on the time and date that Bryan died on. I have also said that the subsequent phone calls made to the victim on the supposed date of his murder could have been received anywhere that his cell phone was. I have questioned the location of Bryan’s cell phone and it has been the cause of some interesting emails and online posts on my blog. The fact that anyone could have been on that phone claiming to be Bryan is something to think about. The fact that his phone could have been anywhere is also questionable as well.

His attorney Sean Macias is said to have called him and spoke to him on several occasions on the day Bryan is supposed to have died but he was not present at the preliminary hearing to testify. I find that interesting, is there a reason for that? Maybe he was to easy impeach as a witness because of the dealings between Lee and Bryan of which he was working on. Or the fact that he claimed in the affidavit that the model had arrived when it was in fact another phone call to Bryan that lead him to that assumption. That phone-call from Robert Wagner to Bryan that was placed at 6:30 PM on the night in question. There were also other phone calls placed that were not listed in the affidavit which puts the question out there as to what are they hiding.

I for one when I look at the evidence against Joe and Harlow do not see them as guilty. What I see is the fact that there are certain questions that still need to be answered. Who was the one who advised Harlow to set up the fake email account and get the throwaway phone? Could this be the reason that Harlow panicked and fled the scene did not call the police or the fire department when he saw that Bryan was dead? Because he knew he was being set up? Could that be the reason behind his bravado on the Blacks Beach tapes? They were not sure if it was Sean and Grant who set them up? Maybe who ever killed Bryan set up this elaborate ploy to remove blame from whoever did this and point it towards Sean, Grant, Joe and Harlow.

This is what the trial is for to get to the bottom of this and I am content to wait for the outcome of it and hope that justice is served. Some seem to think that what has been presented so far is conclusive evidence to convict them, lets just hope they are not on the jury. Let’s hope that they do get an impartial jury who will weigh all of the facts in the case and come to a rightful conclusion. Whether they are found innocent or guilty as long as they have a fair trial I will be satisfied that the law took its course. But I for one still do not believe that they did what they are being accused of. I still do believe that you are innocent until proven guilty.

This is Elmysterio and I’m out.