President Judge Mark Ciavarella doesn’t believe he is legally required to comply with the county’s policy.

So what else is new in Luzerne County? The legal system does not seem to think that the law applies to them when it comes to a court of law. They appear to make their own rules. I guess thats the reason no one wants to go visit that hell hole. I for one am not going to go there for Joe and Harlow's trial. All they would need is some lame excuse to throw you in jail. I'd rather go to a Turkish prison than go to Luzerne County.


Vita bill totals $1.1 million
County psychologist made “twice as much as what he’d make in private practice,” another local practitioner says.
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.comLuzerne County Reporter
Frank Vita was paid $233,005 to provide juvenile psychological evaluations for Luzerne County’s court system from July 2001 through 2003, bringing his total receipts to more than $1.1 million, county records show.
Vita, the brother-in-law of Court of Common Pleas senior Judge Mike Conahan, charges the county $90 per hour, his invoices show.
The hourly pay is reasonable, but his annual earnings from the county are not typical, said Forty Fort psychologist Robert E. Griffin.
Griffin reviewed salary reports and estimates area psychologists earn $70,000 to $100,000 per year. The annual amounts the county paid to Vita are “twice as much as what he’d make in private practice,” said Griffin.
Vita, of Mountain Top, was paid yearly amounts ranging from $180,360 to $233,705 from 2004 through 2007. In 2004, his highest-paid year, calculations show Vita would have had to work 49.9 billable hours a week all 52 weeks of the year.
County Human Services Director Joe DeVizia said the spending on psychological services is “high for our system.”
“But it is a specialty service, and it has to be looked at as a specialty,” DeVizia said.
In comparison, psychologist Leonora Herrmann-Finn is paid $65 an hour, capped at $80,000 for the year, to provide psychological evaluations in the county’s Children and Youth division, according to the July 2007 commissioner meeting agenda. She was chosen through a public advertising process, said county Chief Clerk/Manager Doug Pape.
DeVizia said “good, Ph.D. licensed psychologists” like Vita are becoming as in-demand as psychiatrists and can earn $125,000 or more per year. He said there are “many good psychologists” in the region, but some don’t have experience in the justice system.
However, officials will have to decide if the county can continue to afford to pay so much for juvenile evaluations, DeVizia said.
“The challenge will be getting someone acceptable to the judge at a cost the county can afford,” DeVizia said.
County officials plan to issue a public request for proposals before July 1 to obtain price quotes and qualifications of all psychologists who are interested in the work now handled by Vita, DeVizia said.
The county’s 2004 purchasing policy requires public searches, but the court has not been in compliance.
County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Mark Ciavarella agreed to the public advertising but said he doesn’t believe he is legally required to comply with the county’s policy. Several county officials disagree with his interpretation.
The courts should have embraced a public advertising process, particularly when Conahan served as president judge from 2002 through 2006, said county minority Commissioner Stephen A. Urban. The president judge oversees probation and other court branches.
“The fact that Mr. Vita is Judge Conahan’s brother-in-law raises a big red flag,” Urban said Wednesday.
Conahan and Vita have not responded to requests for comment. Ciavarella has said he supports Vita’s work because he does thorough, quality reports.
Urban said he learned Wednesday that commissioners were never asked to approve a contract for Vita to work for probation, even though other probation contracts routinely come before commissioners.
“Why was this contract handled differently?” Urban asked.
According to Vita’s invoices, he usually bills between 14 and 19 hours for work associated with each juvenile. For example, his $14,805 payment on April 2 covered assessments for 10 juveniles.
His referrals come from the county’s Juvenile Probation Department, according to county Probation Director Larry Saba.
The probation “forensic department” run by Sandy Brullo determines which juvenile offenders receive psychological evaluations, Saba said.
Those evaluations usually involve several tests, according to Vita’s bills. For most clients, he indicates that he performed the following tests: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Bender Gestalt Visual Motor Test, Rorschach Scoring and Interpretation and the Million Adolescent Clinical Inventory Scoring and Interpretation.
“…(I)t is a specialty service, and it has to be looked at as a specialty.”Joe DeVizia
Luzerne County Human Services Director

Group alleges hundreds of county youths denied lawyers

A fun destination is awaiting you, Lovely Luzerne County in the picturesque Allegheny mountains of Pennsylvania. Where lawlessness is a way of life. Come and tour or Judicial system and be amazed by how it slaps the face of the Keystone state. This is the state where the Declaration of Independence and the bill of Rights were signed yet you would never know it by the way the courts operate there.

Group alleges hundreds of county youths denied lawyers
By Terrie Morgan-Besecker tmorgan@timesleader.comLaw & Order Reporter
WILKES-BARRE – Alleging youths are being denied their right to an attorney, a juvenile rights group Tuesday filed a petition asking the state Supreme Court to intervene in hundreds of past and current Luzerne County juvenile court cases.
An attorney for the Juvenile Law Center in Philadelphia said the center was prompted to act after research showed that 50 percent of youths who went through Luzerne County’s juvenile court system in 2005 and 2006 were not represented by an attorney – a figure the center says is 10 times the state average.
The failure to provide even the “most minimal” constitutional protections to those youths resulted in many making admissions of guilt without fully understanding their legal rights or the consequences, said Marsha Levick, the center’s legal director and one of the authors of the petition.
“Luzerne County’s juvenile court proceedings represent the most egregious violation of children’s constitutional rights in Pennsylvania,” Levick said. “When more than half of all youth appear in court without legal representation ... something is seriously wrong and it must be stopped.”
The petition was filed on behalf of two juveniles who went through the court system in 2007, as well as all juveniles with current cases.
It alleges the county’s juvenile judge, Mark Ciavarella, and juvenile probation officials have failed to follow regulations that require juveniles be advised they have a right to an attorney.
The petition further alleges court officials violated state regulations by allowing parents to waive a child’s right to counsel without the child’s consent, and that Ciavarella has failed to question youths who entered guilty pleas to ensure they understand the ramifications of proceeding without an attorney.
The center is asking the court to vacate decisions made in all cases dating from 2005 to present in which the juvenile was not represented by an attorney. It has identified 285 cases from 2005, and 281 from 2006. The number of cases in 2007 and 2008 is not yet known.
Ciavarella acknowledged Tuesday that a high percentage of youths who come before him are not represented by attorneys. He could not explain why the numbers were so much higher than other counties.
The judge said in many cases he believes parents opt not to obtain attorneys because they know their child is guilty.
He insisted parents are advised at every step of the process that their child is entitled to an attorney, and that one will be appointed if they cannot afford one.
“It’s not like they’re walking into this blind. They are advised on three different occasions they have a right to have a lawyer present,” Ciavarella said. “If they want waive their right to an attorney, that’s their business.”
The center’s petition is based on the cases Jessica Van Reeth, now 18, and a female identified as H.T., now 17.
Van Reeth was 16 when she was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia. She and her parents allege they were never advised of her right to an attorney. She admitted guilt and was placed in a residential treatment facility for three months, even though it was her first involvement with police.
H.T. was charged with harassment in April 2007 for creating a Web page that contained derogatory information about an assistant principal at her school.
The girl, also a first-time offender, admitted her actions, was immediately carted off in handcuffs to begin serving a three months at a residential treatment facility.
The child’s mother acknowledged waiving the child’s right to an attorney, but the youth did not sign the waiver, as regulations require. The mother also claimed the child was never questioned to ensure she understood the potential consequences of entering a plea without first consulting an attorney, the petition says.
Ultimately, the child was returned home a few weeks later after the Juvenile Law Center intervened on her behalf and convinced Ciavarella to release her, based on the fact the child had not waived her right to an attorney.
Levick said the center felt at that point the issue was resolved. Since then, there have been at least three other cases in which juveniles alleged they were not afforded an opportunity for counsel, she said.
“When we got (H.T.’s) adjudication reversed we thought we wouldn’t have to do it again,” she said. “As we collected information over the next several moths, we realized we had made no difference. It apparently will take extraordinary action and extraordinary intervention by the Supreme Court to fix this.”
What’s Next
Ciavarella said he has contacted the attorney for the county’s juvenile probation department, who will file a response to the petition. The Supreme Court will review the documents and decide whether it will intervene.
Terrie Morgan-Besecker, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 570-829-7179

Luzerne county up to it's little secret tricks again

The Times Leader is a interesting read, they will tell all of the dirty little secrets of Luzerne County. I wonder if Judge Conahan got a kickback from his brother-in-law for all of the county work he got him?

Judge’s brother-in-law paid $877K
Psych services to court not bid out
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.comLuzerne County Reporter
A Luzerne County judge’s brother-in-law has been paid $877,880 to provide psychological services to the court system since 2004, raising questions about why that work isn’t publicly advertised.

The psychologist, Frank Vita, is married to the sister of Mike Conahan, who is now a senior judge in the county Court of Common Pleas.
Psychology is considered a professional service by county officials.

The county’s 2004 purchasing policy requires public requests for proposals or qualifications for professional services over $7,500. The mandate is meant to give everyone a shot at the work and to gather cost comparisons, though there’s no requirement that the work will go to the individual or business that submits the lowest price.

Common Pleas President Judge Mark Ciavarella said he wasn’t aware of the county purchasing policy and has been abiding by the state County Code, which does not require public advertising for professional services.

Requests-for-proposals will be sought for the psychology service in the future, said county Chief Clerk/Manager Doug Pape.
Ciavarella said he has no problem advertising the psychology work, but he stressed that he does not believe the court is required to abide by the county’s purchasing policy.

“The court is a separate branch of government. They (commissioners) can’t dictate how I manage the court system, as long as I am in compliance with the state law,” Ciavarella said.
But Commissioners Stephen A. Urban and Maryanne Petrilla believe the courts must follow the county policy.

Urban said $877,880 is a lot of money to pay someone without shopping around for the prices and qualifications of other providers.
Petrilla said she knows of no county document or state law that exempts the courts from following county purchasing policies.

“Since the county is the funding source for the courts, and their budget is approved by the commissioners, I see no reason why they don’t follow all county policies,” Petrilla said.
Vita and Conahan could not be reached for comment.
Ciavarella said Vita “does an outstanding job.” Vita assesses juvenile offenders and recommends appropriate treatment to the judge. Ciavarella has been handling juvenile court cases in the county for years.

“When I first got on the bench, I received psychological reports that were not worth the paper they were printed on. His reports are 10 and 20 pages long and very extensive,” Ciavarella said.
Vita typically spends 10 to 16 hours evaluating each juvenile offender, Ciavarella said.
“In the juvenile system, it’s so important to get the child in the right program. Without that, we’re just wasting our money,” Ciavarella said.

Vita started providing psychology services to the court system when Joseph Augello was president judge, said county Probation Director Larry Saba.
Conahan then served as president judge from 2002 through 2006 until Ciavarella took over the role. The president judge decides who is hired in court branches and oversees the court’s administrative affairs.

The controller’s office did not have records on Vita’s payments before 2004.
Here’s the breakdown of what Vita was paid: $233,705 in 2004; $189,495 in 2005; $200,160 in 2006; $180,360 in 2007 and $74,160 this year to date.
Purchasing has become an issue in the county since the recent discovery that prison kitchen purchases were illegally piecemealed, or broken into smaller amounts to circumvent requirements to obtain quotes and/or bids.

County officials have started visiting each department and discovered other examples of purchases that did not comply with the county’s purchasing policy.
Jennifer Learn-Andes, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 831-7333.

I wonder if they did the psych evaluation on Joe Kerekes as well as Bryan Kocis in his first case? It really makes you woinder what is going on in Luzerne County.

PC is on a mission

Well it looks like PC is on a mission to cause problems for me. What I find interesting is that he himself asked me to keep our conversations private which I did. I never posted any of our conversations on my blog yet he has done exactly what he asked me not to do.

Well I have all of our conversations archived as well as all of the emails but I choose not to post them. To me it seems that he is just a bit pissed off at me for some stupid reason. My blog is a place for me to say what I want to say about how I feel about this murder case and his is his place to do the same.

What I find funny is that he is now attacking me for my opinion. He claims that I don't have proof to back up the comments that I have made but I know who his source was in Virginia Beach court system. I also know that he was informed by this source on who to contact in the Luzerne County Court system. I have this in PC's own words in comments that he made to me.

So I guess he is now going to play nasty. That really is to bad because I don't think it is that important to destroy someone with their own words and I won't go there unless I am pushed.

this is Elmysterio and I'm out.

Prodigy Pictures is on the rise.

Brent Corrigan AKA Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy have finally got a good business partner to help them Get there company Prodgy Pictures off the ground. With the new infusion of cash and expertise they seem to be on they're way to a successful venture. I Have been a fan of Dink Flamingo for quite sometime and I can see that he is going to help Sean and Grant achieve what they have been trying to achieve for quite sometime.

No thanks to Lee bergeron and all of the others who have tried to destroy his asperations Sean has made two new videos the Porne Ultimatum and Brent Corrigans Summit and they are both due to be relesed this month if all goes well. I have also read on his web-site that he is soon to be in paradise filming his next epic. I have not seen his first effort and don't really know if I will but I do wish him the best of luck. It has been a rough couple of years for him.

I just thought that I would get the truth out there before the Internet Maggot got his smelly fingers all over it. Seems he is setting up a new big lie to tell the world but we all know he does not know a damn thing about this.

This is Elmysterio and I'm out.

The 385

With 385 potential witnesses who seem to be at the beck and call of the prosecution in the Kocis case willing to testify to the whereabouts of Joe Kerekes on the night of January 24th 2007. It would seem that Joe does not stand a chance at defending himself against the allegations that he is charged with. It would appear that Luzerne County has him dead to rights. I guess Joe was on Bryan’s web cam and this can be proven by the prosecution. You know the same web cam that Robert Wagner witnessed Bryan’s murder on. It is really to bad that the desk clerk at the hotel could not ID Joe at the preliminary hearing.

As for his criminal record it would appear that Joe is a bad driver and he should be kept off the road, as he is a serial speeder with tinted windows. Harlow’s criminal record is just as bad as Joe’s is with the exception that Harlow is a serial masseuse. With Joe and Harlow’s serious criminal records it seems that what the prosecution claims would be a stretch. But the prosecution seems to think that two people who have no record of violent crime would travel to Pennsylvania and commit this crime unprovoked. The police claim that this is the motive."Investigators claim the two Virginia men killed Kocis, their rival in the gay porn industry, inside his home and then set the house on fire. Kocis, 44, was found dead by firefighters".

Some seem to think that Joe and Harlow had a large debt load that this was a good reason for them to commit this crime. They also feel that Joe and Harlow thought that Sean Lockhart would be their financial savior. These same people seem to think that Joe and Harlow were under the impression that getting Sean to work for their web-site would help them make a wad of cash. This I find interesting because Joe and Harlow would have to produce a video with Sean and get it distributed to make this wad of cash. A video that would take weeks to months to get put on the market and it is not even a sure thing that anyone would really even want to see it.
For the record Harlow has never publicly admitted he was at Bryan’s house and from what we have been told the police have no solid evidence to prove otherwise. As far as public statements made by Harlow there really have not been any. As far as we know the only thing that says that Harlow was ever at Bryan’s house are the Blacks Beach tapes. From what I gather from the comments on the blogs is that Harlow is a known liar. So I guess we can not believe anything that he says. This is proven in the letters that he sent to Damon and the alibi that he claimed he had. So why would you believe what he said on those beach tapes?

The prosecution seems to be a little pissed off that Harlow finally has a good attorney and now they want to take that away from him by filing this latest motion. Funny thing is that it would seem that Joe’s attorneys would be the ones filing this motion not the prosecution. I guess the prosecution wants to make sure that Joe has a fair trial. It makes you wonder what Melnick is thinking. Is he that scared that his reputation will be smeared again by Fannick. You would think that with 385 potential witnesses Melnick would have a sure thing when it comes to a guilty verdict. But I guess they want the state of Pennsylvania to foot the bill for Harlow's attorney? Maybe so they can wrap this up in a nice little package like they did with the other case that concerned Bryan Kocis.

With all of the evidence that the prosecution is claiming you would think that they would not resort to dirty tricks but I guess that just shows that the case against Joe and Harlow is not as strong as they are claiming. As far as I am concerned the case is not as clear-cut as some would think. With all of the evidence that it would seem that Sean Lockhart had against Bryan I find it strange that Bryan was not arrested. If Sean went to the FBI on the four occasions that I was told of why did they not take any action against him. With the email threats and the civil suit and all of the other underhanded things that Bryan did to Sean and Grant it would seem that they would have taken Sean’s accusations seriously.

It is clear that Bryan wanted to control Sean and make his life a living hell. That has been proven with the backdoor deal between he and Lee Bergeron. Bryan went as far as to get a separate Cobra Video just to file the civil suit against Sean and Grant. It appears that Bryan seemed to have some sort of hold on the FBI for them not to take Sean’s case seriously. Bryan also must have had some sort of hold over the head of the Luzerne County Judicial system as well for his prior case to be basically dismissed. Why would Judge Connahan not require him to register as a sex offender when he videotaped himself having sex with a 15 year-old boy?

The defense that Bryan used was that the boy lied to him about his age. Bryan also claimed he was going to use the 15 year-old in a video for his company. He claimed that he filmed him and he "forgot" to get the boys ID. Which I might add it is against the law to film a model without having valid records of the age of the model on file (US 2257). But apparently that never stopped Bryan before. By the way all of these claims were made against a company that at the time did not even exist. There are several people who would have a valid reason to kill Bryan Kocis as he was not a nice person. He was a gambler and a child molester and he was a liar. Who knows why he was killed the fact is that he was but it has still not been proven as to when he was killed. The Coroner can not confirm time of death, just how he was killed. They are still not even positive as to the murder weapon.

I have been accused of all types of things with regards to this case. Funny thing is most of the stuff that I have been accused of saying is stuff that I have read in the newspapers. So I guess I am using a bad resource for my information. But I was told that the newspapers were a good source information. You know with all of the things that I am accused of saying I just find it funny that some are trying to attribute all of this to me. I guess they are just so intent on spreading lies about everything regarding this case that they need to pin the blame on someone. Did Joe and Harlow have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. Did Sean and Grant have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. As far as I am concerned this is a circumstantial case and it always has been, nothing more nothing less.

This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

Gladiator Movie or Porn Movie?

The movie "300" was hot men in capes and very little else. Well all I can say is if you have not seen it you should. I’m not really into war movies but this one made up for all the fight scenes with the visually stunning wardrobe or the lack thereof. It had great action sequences and epic battles but it was hard to follow the story because of all of the eye candy that filled the screen. The acting was good from what I gathered but as I said earlier it was very hard to follow with the wind machines and flowing capes and nearly naked men with their hair blowing in every frame of this film.
The one thing that impressed me the most was that the average age of the cast was 35 years old. If you have any negative body issues I would recommend you pass this one up but if you like hot men in battle then this is a flick you will enjoy. The actors were on a grueling work out regimen for at least 6 weeks before filming started and during the 2-month shoot and it shows they're dedication to their work ethic when you see this film. If you converted all of the six-packs on those guys in this movie to beer all of the college boys in this country would be drunk. This movie reeks of a Titan porn video maybe they should do one and call it "369" or something like that.

Cause this movie had it all, big ol healthy mens all hot and sweaty from battle half naked and hot and sexy in their capes and with their big swords and hair all blowing in the wind and their heaving chests and long well muscled legs and firm round butts all squoze up in their hot tight little leather briefs. Opps another run on sentence.



The cast is an interesting mix of fairly well known actors and not so well known actors and they are all visually appealing. There is quite a bit of CGI in this movie. Most of the film was filmed on blue or Green screen and the sets were all pretty much put in on post-production but the men were real and they worked really hard to look good for us in this move and that is the most important part. It does follow the original story very well and the movie has a good flow.

The battle scenes were stunning and it was just a fun and good time had by all that watched this film. I would definitely watch it again just to pay a little more attention to the story.





This is Elmysterio and I’m out

Moving on.

It seems that my blog has become a place where all we discuss is the murder of Bryan Kocis. Well that is far from my only interest in life. As I have been blogging here since February and I am getting just a bit tired of all of this. So I have stated my views and now I will be moving on to different subjects, which is what I originally wanted to do with this blog. So this murder will no longer be the center of attention of my blog. I will not delete the older posts and they will remain there for you to read. I will still comment on it as it is still one of my interests so you can still expect to hear from me on that subject. That being said lets move on.

Now for a bit of news: I just received an email from the new owners of Boybatter and they seem to think that my little blog is a good place to make this announcement. Well I guess I already made that announcement did I not, oh well so much for suspense. Well here is the news anyway; they are no longer affiliated with Joe and Harlow. The new owners are going to reopen the Boisrus site and it will be a site where you can send your amateur videos in and they can be voted on and the winners will receive fabulous prizes. It will no longer be affiliated with the escort site as there will not be any of "that" going on there.

As for the Boybatter site they have some new content and they are going to be updating it on a regular basis. It appears that Angel and Star are doing some work for them. So far they have 5 new scenes up and ready and more on the way. They had to move to a new server as they were having trouble with some Turkish rebels who did not like the site. But that is all behind them and the site appears to be working fine now. If you want to get a idea of what is going on at the new and improved Boybatter and Boisrus site check out Drab Boiz. He will be posting updates and links on his site.


Then we have the little issue of Joey K. who it seems is a little bent out of shape about the sale of the company he and Harlow helped to build. His latest rant on his blog seems to be a direct result of his demands of certain financial considerations not being met. I guess he is just a little pissed that he did not get considered a little more in the financial department and he carried out the threat that he made against Harlow. So I guess that there really is no deal between Harlow and the DA. Just Joe blowing off some more steam. I just have a bit of advice for Joey K., shut up and let your attorneys do the talking and follow Harlow’s lead. Oh well since when has Joe ever listened to me anyway? There are two instances that come to mind when he did not.

I am not in the porn industry and never have been but I have known several people who were and still are involved. So my view was always from the outside looking in. I don’t really understand what the whole hoopla is all about when it comes to some guys and girls taking of their cloths and having sex on camera for others to watch. That is something that I have never done and when I was offered the chance I turned it down. As far as doing porn goes I just read the latest post over on Brent Corrigan’s blog and he does one of his long dissertations on the pros and cons of the business and it was quite interesting. The little bitch must have read my mind or something cause I was going to do a post just like that.

To me most of the porn out there is not that good. It just appears to be some models going through the motions. There have been highlights that I have seen over the years but they are few and far between. The Boisrus idea seems like something that just might work out because you will have people who are into each other performing the nasty on film or tape or whatever the fuck you record on these days. And it will be a pay-site where you can submit your own content and get voted on. I guess it will be a kind of Sex Star Search. Now how cool is that. I wonder is there is going to be a special talent category? Now that could be interesting.


So I was thinking the other day that if I were going to put together my favorite scenes from several different porn movies and create the best porn movie ever what scenes would they be? So I started to go through the archives and find out which scenes were the hottest that I have seen in recent years. That my dear readers is going be a most daunting task to say the least. What are the criteria for a porn scene to be hot? Well I would have to say chemistry between the models is a given. The models don’t necessarily have to be hot as fuck for that to occur. But the if the models are attractive that does help but what is really hot is when the models appear as if they would choose the partner that they are paired with.



But I can say that I have seen a few that cum to mind right away. One of them is the now infamous scene with Kurt Wild and Julien when he was with Corbin Fisher when he gets fucked for the first time. That was hot. Then there was the scene with Chaosmen when he blew his wad for the first time while getting fucked the look on his face was priceless. Oh and Kurt is very vocal while in the throws of passion. A couple of his best lines were "Fuck me like you mean it" and "Man handle me" that was hot.

Then there was the scene with Harlow and Troy from Boybatter. That scene was way hot and I must also add it was quite sensuous as well. Another great line was uttered in that one and it was not so much the line but how it was said. When troy is getting it good and he say’s "Fuck me Harlow" and you knew he meant it. Funny thing is most of the scenes that are really hot that come to mind where with amateur companies. It looks like the pros are slipping a bit behind in the hotness category. But you can’t count them out yet. So it would appear that Boisrus just might be on to something here.

There was the scene with the late Danny Roddick and Alex Chandler from Hard Studies as well as his pairing with Josh Weston in Boot Black Blues. Those were hot scenes and they were done by Buckshot. That warehouse scene in Wrong Side Of The Tracks with Johnny Hazzard and Shane Rollins was way hot. Channe 1 releasing won a few awards for that one, Go Chi Chi.

As far as the sites that I enjoy for their content: Sean Cody, Corbin Fisher, Chaosmen, Boybatter and College Dudes 247 come to mind. There are several others who have shinning moments but they are in no way consistent. So I want you to all chime in with your feedback so we can see if we can cum up with the hottest porn video of all time.

So tell me what scenes you thought were hot and who was in the scene and why it was so hot that you remember it and we will discuss it and add it to the list. I really don’t feel that it has to be any certain category because I like it all from bear to jock to twink. As long as the scene is hot I really don’t think it matters all that much. So lets get this discussion under way and see what we all can come up with. Hope to hear from you all soon.

This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

Black Helicopters and other conspiracy theories:

So let me get this all straight the prosecution want us to believe this is what really happened:

Sean and Grant contact Joe and Harlow. Grant thinks Harlow would be a great fit to work with Sean on their web-site. But Joe and Harlow also think that Sean is a hot property and they offer Sean a huge sum of money to work for their web-site but Sean turns them down because it is to good to be true. So which is it? But then Sean and Grant invite Joe and Harlow to Las Vegas where Joe and Harlow take them out to dinner and Drop 3 large on the feast.
The subject of Bryan is brought up and they discuss how he has been in the way of Sean and Grant’s success and how at every turn Bryan was there to stop them from doing what they wanted to do.

Somehow the subject turns to what can be done about Bryan and Joe and Harlow are said to make an offer to kill him. Sean and Grant decline that offer and assume that Joe and Harlow do the same. But unbeknownst to Sean and Grant, Joe and Harlow secretly hatch a plan and tell several people about their plan to do away with Bryan and to make Sean an indentured sex slave for they’re boydelo. As we all know Sean has no say in the matter because he is so easily controlled. Bryan can attest to that, he could totally control Sean. That was proven by the ironclad contract that he had with Sean. Oh wait Sean broke that contract and took the car that Bryan purchased for him and did not fulfill his obligations. Oh wait I’m going off subject here, so back to Joe and Harlow.

They fly back to Virginia and put their plot in into motion. They send out an email to all of the subscribers of their web-site announcing their new deal with Sean/Brent and the new distribution deal in the works. They tell informant number 1 and Justin Hensley Informant #2 that they really want to work with Sean and that mean old Bryan won’t let them. In the three days prior to the murder their plan to do away with Bryan is put in to motion. Because Bryan has so much control of Brent/Sean and they really must work with him because of their so-called dire financial situation. So they hatch a plan to go to Pennsylvania to kill him and destroy all of the Cobra Video records and to still a Rolex watch so that they will now have 6 of them and to steal some video cameras.

They get a throw away phone to only be used to call Bryan and they buy a knife and a gun but they don’t use them and they rent a car which they use because they don’t want to drive one of their fancy cars to Pennsylvania in the dead of winter. You know the salted roads can be hell on your fancy car. They also create an email account only to be used to email Bryan and they get a background report done on Bryan as well as email him their pictures. They go to visit Bryan a man they have never met before and kill him in cold blood because he is in the way of them working with the biggest prize in porn. Then they burn his house to hide the fact that they were ever there and they call Sean the day after to say look at what has happened. And claim that “I guess my guy went a little crazy”. Then they send some threatening messages to Sean and Grant about the deal they supposedly had.

But they seem to have forgot that they told a few people about they’re plan and now they have to run and hide in Florida while they tell everyone that they are in Hawaii. They post on several blogs that they are innocent and they talk to the newspapers and deny that they knew the victim and they say that they were in Virginia at the time of his death. While the whole time they are trying to recruit people to lie about their whereabouts. Then they have the audacity to make a video about their meeting with “Drake” the supposed killer of the victim. Then to top it all off they get a contract sent to them by Sean and Grant to work together and they fly to San Diego and tell Sean and Grant all about their exploits and how they witness Bryan get killed. And they apologize to Sean and Grant for the trouble that they caused them.

Then they get arrested and proclaim their innocence and are extradited to Pennsylvania and the first thing that Joe says when they arrive is that Harlow went to the house alone while he was in the motel room surfing the Internet. And Harlow claims he did not do it and that Bryan was dead when he arrived at his house.

This all makes perfect sense to me if they are crazed killers and mentally defective. The fact that they tell several people about their plan to kill a man that they have never met just to work with a twink porn star. They are by all means mentally defective if they thought this plan would work. Does anyone else see this? You have to be a special kind of stupid to think you will get away with a crime this stupid.

Did I get all this right?


So let’s recap:

1: They tell two people who live with them that they are going to Pennsylvania to kill Bryan. And they also tell them they want to work with Brent Corrigan/ Sean Lockhart one of the models of Bryan Kocis’s Cobra Video and that Bryan is in the way of them doing so. And it is assumed that they must kill him.

2: They have dinner with the model Sean Lockhart and his boyfriend Grant Roy who they want to work with and they discuss killing Sean's boss to do so.

3: They send out an email to their web subscribers announcing that they are going to be working with Brent Corrigan. (This model is said to be under contract with Cobra Video. But the contract that was in place at the time of the murder was not exclusive and Sean/Brent could in fact work with other models with the exception of any Cobra model and he could also work for other studios. The contract that he had prior to the settlement was voided when Sean Lockhart breached it in September 2005. That is why there was a settlement.)

4: They create a fake email account get a Internet background check on the victim and send him their pictures and get a throwaway phone and buy weapons and rent a car all using their own credit card and rent a room in Pennsylvania using their drivers license.

5: They do all of this in the hopes that they will get away with killing someone whom they have never met just to get the opportunity to work with Brent/ Sean and make millions.

6: And to top it all off they attempt to burn down the victim’s house to destroy all of the evidence. But they cant resist and steal two cameras and a Rolex watch as souvenirs and take them back to Virginia and leave them in their own house for the police to find when they search it. They did all of this thinking that they would get away with murder.

In Summary:
Now I don’t know about any of you all out there but to me this sounds like someone who could just be a little crazy. A psychiatric evaluation is really not out of the question here.

If all of what the DA in Luzerne County is claiming to be true then they must be certifiable and therefore can not be put to death. But he has filed a petition for the death penalty in this case so he must think that they are not crazy. So what is it? Is this in fact what they did or is it just a trumped up case with a bunch of circumstantial evidence made to fit the crime? Is there a simpler reason why they went to Pennsylvania?

To me it looks like the DA has truly upped the ante on his burden of proof with all of these allegations.
It would appear that he now must prove that they planned this and that in the planning of all of this they were sane individuals.

The reason the DA is trying to prove that they had someone lie about there whereabouts on the night in question is to prove that they had the fore thought to get people to lie for them in the process of this crime and it would go to show that they were sane and that they knew it was wrong.

There must be some reason for this murder other than what the prosecution is claiming. The motive in all of this will only work if those accused were in fact crazy at the time this crime was committed.

My opinion

From what I have discerned from all of this is that Harlow wanted to work with Sean and he could do this with Cobra Video. He did not want Bryan to know about his link to Boybatter and escorting. The reason for this was because of the trick that Sean and Grant played on Bryan in Las Vegas. Using Boybatter as a point of leverage in the negotiations with Bryan. They did this for a better settlement deal and it apparently worked. So Harlow and Joe decided that they would create a false name. That is how Danny Moilin was born. So now that we have that out of the way Harlow/Danny sends an application to Cobra Video with his pictures attached. He goes out and buys a throwaway phone to contact Bryan and he creates a fake email account. All of this to maintain the secrecy of who he really is. All is well so far and contact is made and Bryan and Danny agree to meet.

Joe and Harlow go to the pawnshop and buy a gun and a knife. This might have been done for any number of reasons none of which I know other than Joe was a collector of such. They also do an Internet check on Bryan. I will not try to guess as to why they did that either only to say that if any of what Sean and Grant might have told them made them want to do so.

They rent a car and drive to Pennsylvania and stay in a motel and register under Joe’s name. They are in contact with Bryan via phone and email several times during these three days. Harlow’s original appointment was set for a earlier time but Bryan called him and changed it to a later time as he was having meetings and he would not be available until later in the evening.

Harlow is said to have arrived at Bryan’s sometime either just before 8:00PM or shortly thereafter and he says that when he arrived he saw that the front door was slightly opened and he called Bryan’s name and went in. He said that he saw that Bryan was dead on the couch and he heard someone upstairs and that they were about to come downstairs and he panicked fled the scene.

Now from phone records we have Bryan talking to his attorney at 7:50PM for the last time and it is assumed that he was still alive. Harlow is logging into his email account at 8:06PM, where was he when this occurred. And from witness testimony we have Harlow leaving the house at 8:20PM and the fire being reported at 8:34PM and the fire department arriving about 10 minutes later.

So what we have is about a 20-30 minute time frame for all of this to have happened. The crucial thing is when did Harlow arrive and who was in the house besides Bryan. As the affidavit says Harlow was logging into his email at 8:06PM. Was he at Bryan’s house when he did that or had he not arrived yet? If Harlow was not at the house @ 8:06PM then that cuts the time available for him to have done all of this down to just minutes. Ip records and Cell tower pings will show this. If Harlow arrived as he has said and Bryan was dead then this case has gone in the wrong direction from the beginning. As I have said all along that the burden of proof in all of this is on the prosecution and the facts to me just don’t add up and Joe and Harlow are innocent until proven guilty.

As far as conspiracy theories go there really are none other than a “rush” to justice, which I might add is really a slow rush. The police and the prosecution have done their level best to make their case work with the evidence that they have but to me it just does not jell. I think once we go to court and all of the evidence is presented it will become quite obvious that something is really wrong with all of this.

This is Elmysterio and I'm out

Bare Backing Across America, Or the next viral explosion

I for one did not have a clue about AID’s when I was in my early twenties. It was something new and no one really knew what it was. We are talking about the early eighties here. I got wise real quick and made it a point to not sleep around with just anyone and I tended to have steady boyfriends during that time. Many of my friends were not so lucky and they got infected early on and the medications that they were taking were toxic to their systems and they died. We now have better medicine and people are living longer with the virus but that does not make me want to go out and get infected. I just read a post on DeWayne’s blog about three models who just tested positive after a bare back shoot. They’re ages were 18 to 26 years old. This I find quite alarming and so preventable. These guys now are sentenced to a daily regimen of pills and regular blood tests to insure that the virus does not progress.




Now I was watching a video the other day and I noticed that there were a lot of the current batch of models in it and they all preformed bare back.
Here are the names of a just few models who have preformed bare back in the last few years. Some of them might be a shock to you but they did it for smaller companies and they have since moved on to mainstream work.
Leo M pictured on the left just recently made it public that he tested positive. He worked for Eurocreme and Blake Mason. Blake Mason is a strong advocate of the use of condoms. Many of the companies are now starting to film models bareback and it is the models choice to do so. Some companies are adamant about not going there because they have seen first hand what can happen. Chi Chi Larue is one of the ones who has said she would abandon porn if it came to that.




We all know of Brent Corrigan and Aaron Phelps, they were under contract with Cobra Video. But did you know that Josh Vaughn did a bareback video, how about
Zack Randall, Brent Everett or Tory Mason.

Yes they have all gone on to bigger and better things but they all preformed in bareback porn. There are many others who have gone the same route. I have no bad feelings towards any of them because it. It is their life and the choice is theirs to make but was it an informed choice? If they were faced with the same choice would they do bareback porn again? I for one would not if the opportunity were presented to me. As far as I know they are all still HIV negative and I truly hope they all stay that way.





From what I know now there is no way in hell that I would do it. I spoke to Harlow and Joe about the bareback porn they filmed and I told them that I had my concerns and they told me about what they did to insure that they’re models were safe. That is all fine and good but you can not insure that a model always practices safe sex. So how are we to insure the health of the models that perform in these videos? The fact of the matter is that we can not. No amount of testing and can insure you that someone is not carrying the virus. This was just proven in the case in England. The models were all tested before the shoot but one had not converted yet and the virus did not show up in the standard antibody test. He in turn infected 3 other models. Now this model was responsible enough to inform the producers about this and the other models were tested.




But this is not always the case and there have been incidences were some models don’t care and will infect as many people as they can. There is one known model that has done just that. My question is who should be held responsible for the testing and the health of the models? The producers, the models or should we just let things go the way they are and not care.

Eastern Europe is starting to show signs of a outbreak of new HIV infections and that is becoming quite alarming since most of the market saturation of Bareback porn is coming from there.

Bareback porn is up to a 30% share of the market and it is rising fast, especially in the twink market. Most of these boys are far to young to have a real grip on what it means to be positive. And they are doing bareback porn because they are told that it is safe and that the models are tested and they will be paid more for it. Consider this you are eighteen and you need money and you have a gun with one bullet and some one who tells you it is safe. Do you spin the chamber and hope the one bullet is not there? That is what it is like to perform in bareback porn. I just want to say this: Consider your options and if you don’t feel safe doing it then don’t do it. Dominik Trojan Pictured on the left has made at least 20 Bareback videos and he seems to want to move on as far as I know he is still negative. I have seen what AID’s has done to the gay community FIRST HAND and I for one do not want to see us go through it again.

I have seen allot of porn and I can tell you from my own personal experience that whether they use condoms or not does not make it hot. Some of the worst porn I have seen did not use condoms and some of the best did. Is bareback porn hot? It can be but I have seen porn where they use condoms and it is hotter than most of the bareback porn that I have seen. Porn is just what it is, some is good and some of it really sucks the big one. It really is all about chemistry. If the models have chemistry than it is hot if they don’t then it is just going through the motions. Most of the European videos that don’t use condoms are not worth the time it takes to watch them. I could make a list but that would be another post.

This is elmysterio and I’m out.