Elmysterio Revealed

BB in his own way has found a picture of me and posted it on his blog. Now the world knows what I look like. Who gave him that picture, and why would some one out me on the blogs.

It looks like the state is taking a interest in Luzerne County

State backs challenge of juvie cases
Agency: Percentage of county kids in away treatment 2 1/2 times the state average.
By Terrie Morgan-Besecker tmorgan@timesleader.comLaw & Order Reporter
WILKES-BARRE – Concerned by what it deems an “unusually high” placement rate for delinquent youths, the state Department of Public Welfare intends to file a legal brief supporting a juvenile advocacy group’s efforts to overturn hundreds Luzerne County juvenile cases, a DPW spokesman said Thursday.
Related headlines
Juvenile’s attorneys seek to vacate ruling
Matt Jones of DPW said department officials believe the high percentage of youths being placed in out-of-home treatment programs is at least partially tied to an assertion that a disproportionate number appear before Judge Mark Ciavarella without an attorney – the key issue in a court action filed last week by the Juvenile Law Center of Philadelphia.
Statistics from the Juvenile Court Judges Commission show that Luzerne County’s placement rate was roughly 2 � times the state average for all counties from 2004 to 2006, the latest data available.
In 2006, 24.5 percent of youths who appeared before Ciavarella for hearings were sent to residential treatment programs, according to the commission’s annual report. The statewide average was 10.3 percent. In 2005, 21 percent of Luzerne County youths were placed, compared to 9.6 percent for the state. In 2004, 22 percent were placed, compared to 10.4 percent for the state.
Ciavarella could not be reached for comment Thursday. In prior interviews he has staunchly defended his philosophy on juvenile placements, saying he favors placement over other alternatives because it’s the only thing that will “get a child’s attention.”
That philosophy is now being questioned by DPW, as well as the Juvenile Law Center.
The center last Tuesday filed a petition asking the state Supreme Court to intervene in Luzerne County juvenile court proceedings, citing what it believes to be serious violations of a child’s right to due process.
The center took the extraordinary legal action based on statistics that showed 50 percent of youths who appeared before Ciavarella in 2005 and 2006 were not represented by an attorney – 10 times the state average.
Further research showed that nearly 60 percent of those youths were placed in residential treatment programs, the center said. The petition asks the Supreme Court to overturn more than 500 cases in which juveniles appeared without attorneys.
Jones said DPW decided to support the center’s petition because it shares the concern that juveniles’ right to due process may be being violated. DPW expects to file its brief by today or Monday.
“We feel those protections should be provided to those who are adjudicated in Luzerne County. We feel this is at least in part responsible for the high placement rate in Luzerne County,” he said.
DPW has an interest in the placement rate, he said, because the department reimburses counties 50 percent juvenile detention costs, and 60 to 70 percent of the cost for treatment programs.
“We do not regularly monitor placement rates of delinquent youth, but we have been aware for some time that Luzerne County has an unusually high placement rate,” Jones said.
Ciavarella is particularly fond of placing youths in wilderness-type programs. Statistics show that from 2004 to 2006, more than 50 percent of youths who were detained were sent to wilderness programs. That compares to a state average of roughly 10 to 12 percent.
Jones said the DPW first approached county officials about the disparity in placement rates last year. The department has been working with court and probation officials to regarding possible alternatives.
“There are some things we’ve seen work effectively in other counties, such as work programs, mentoring and electronic monitoring, in lieu of incarceration,” Jones said. “We would like to see Luzerne County work with us to consider some alternatives for placement other than the detention center option.”
Ciavarella, who is being represented by attorney Howard Holmes of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, has until the end of next week to file a reply to the center’s petition.
Terrie Morgan-Besecker, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 570-829-7179

Judge Ciavarella defends his stance with regards to Vita

Judge Conahan pictured here


Luzerne county is coming under fire for its judicial practices. Citizens of Luzerne county speak out on the corruption in they're judicial system. Some are asking for a investigation into the court system. Judge Conahan and Dr. Vita, his brother-in-law could not be reached for comment. I am wondering if the citizens will start to question some of the Judges prior cases.
One case comes to mind with regards to Judge Conahan. That would be the "correction" of the record of Bryan Kocis. Maybe just maybe it is going to come back and bite them in the ass. Now I don't know about any of you all but the murder of Mr. Kocis is going to bring more attention to the practices of the Luzerne County Judicial system.
I have always wondered if it was just a coincidence that Judge Conahan retired right before Joe and Harlow were arrested. Was that a calculated move to protect himself from the fallout of his prior ruling with regards to the murder victims criminal past.

Murder victim Bryan kocis pictured left and murder suspects Joe kerekes and Harlow Cuadra pictured right


The arrest of Joe and Harlow and the subsequent trial would bring to light much negativity with regards to the Judge's ruling on the murder victims case. Could that be the reason that Judge Ciavarella stepped into Judge Peter Paul Olszewski Jr. case and allowed the suspects to have the same attorneys as the victim. It is rumored that Judge Conahan hand picked Judge Ciavarella as his successor. It really makes you wonder what is going on in Luzerne County. The "Times Leader" seems to be questioning the conduct of the judicial system of Luzerne county. I myself think it is high time. I wonder if Ciavarella is related to Conahan or Vita. Also there is the question of the "good friend" of Conahan who runs the youth detention facility that most of the juvenile criminals are sentenced to.


More questions raised over services of county juvenile court psychologist
Woman says family forced to use Vita’s services, at a cost of thousands.
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.comLuzerne County Reporter
A Plains Township woman said a Luzerne County judge forced her and family members to undergo counseling with psychologist Frank Vita as part of her son’s juvenile court proceeding, costing her thousands of dollars out of her own pocket.

Conahan
Times Leader Photo Store
Erica Michaliga said she now questions that court order in light of the recent revelation that Vita is the brother-in-law of Court of Common Pleas Senior Judge Mike Conahan.
But Court of Common Pleas President Judge Mark Ciavarella, who signed the court order, said Michaliga is completely off base because she and her mother-in-law requested Vita in the first place.
“They were so happy with Dr. Vita after the psych evaluation, that they asked if they could continue to see him,” Ciavarella said. “They requested Dr. Vita.”
Michaliga said she initially welcomed Vita’s counseling because she thought it would be temporary and covered by insurance.
Michaliga said she doesn’t believe the judge made it clear that she had a choice. She said she frequently told Vita she was having difficulty paying him. She plans to review the court transcripts because she believes she raised concerns about the cost of the payment in court.
Vita got involved with the case because the county had paid him to conduct a psychological evaluation of her son, she said. Michaliga said Vita told her he was recommending counseling to the judge and offered to provide it. She said she thought it was a good idea to stay with him because Vita played a key role in the judge’s decision on where her son would be placed.
Ciavarella said Michaliga and her mother-in-law, who was also involved in the counseling, were free to choose any counselor, and he said he never received a request to switch counselors.
“I didn’t care what family counselor they went to. I never would have ordered Dr. Vita without their input,” he said.
The mother-in-law was not named in the documents, and Michaliga said the mother-in-law was not willing to speak to a reporter.
Michaliga said she paid Vita thousands of dollars and has asked him for a copy of bills so she may determine the exact amount. Vita could not be reached for comment on several attempts.
On July 7, 2006, Ciavarella ordered her to pay Vita $1,075 in overdue payments within 30 days. He said Michaliga was trying to “stiff” Vita.
Michaliga and Ciavarella have clashed in the past over a court case involving an insurance claim at Atmosphere Salon and Day Spa, which she used to own.
The county has paid Vita $1.1 million since 2001 to provide psychological evaluations of juvenile offenders, county records show.
County officials plan to publicly advertise the work before July 1 – something that wasn’t done in the past – to determine if other psychologists are interested. The cost of the service will also be considered, county officials say.
Vita charges $90 per hour and usually bills between 14 and 19 hours for work associated with each juvenile, his bills show.
The county probation office, which determines which clients are evaluated by Vita, reported Thursday that Vita saw 120 juvenile offenders in 2007 and 40 offenders this year to date.
Vita was paid $180,360 in 2007 and $74,160 so far this year.
Jennifer Learn-Andes, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 831-7333.

President Judge Mark Ciavarella doesn’t believe he is legally required to comply with the county’s policy.

So what else is new in Luzerne County? The legal system does not seem to think that the law applies to them when it comes to a court of law. They appear to make their own rules. I guess thats the reason no one wants to go visit that hell hole. I for one am not going to go there for Joe and Harlow's trial. All they would need is some lame excuse to throw you in jail. I'd rather go to a Turkish prison than go to Luzerne County.


Vita bill totals $1.1 million
County psychologist made “twice as much as what he’d make in private practice,” another local practitioner says.
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.comLuzerne County Reporter
Frank Vita was paid $233,005 to provide juvenile psychological evaluations for Luzerne County’s court system from July 2001 through 2003, bringing his total receipts to more than $1.1 million, county records show.
Vita, the brother-in-law of Court of Common Pleas senior Judge Mike Conahan, charges the county $90 per hour, his invoices show.
The hourly pay is reasonable, but his annual earnings from the county are not typical, said Forty Fort psychologist Robert E. Griffin.
Griffin reviewed salary reports and estimates area psychologists earn $70,000 to $100,000 per year. The annual amounts the county paid to Vita are “twice as much as what he’d make in private practice,” said Griffin.
Vita, of Mountain Top, was paid yearly amounts ranging from $180,360 to $233,705 from 2004 through 2007. In 2004, his highest-paid year, calculations show Vita would have had to work 49.9 billable hours a week all 52 weeks of the year.
County Human Services Director Joe DeVizia said the spending on psychological services is “high for our system.”
“But it is a specialty service, and it has to be looked at as a specialty,” DeVizia said.
In comparison, psychologist Leonora Herrmann-Finn is paid $65 an hour, capped at $80,000 for the year, to provide psychological evaluations in the county’s Children and Youth division, according to the July 2007 commissioner meeting agenda. She was chosen through a public advertising process, said county Chief Clerk/Manager Doug Pape.
DeVizia said “good, Ph.D. licensed psychologists” like Vita are becoming as in-demand as psychiatrists and can earn $125,000 or more per year. He said there are “many good psychologists” in the region, but some don’t have experience in the justice system.
However, officials will have to decide if the county can continue to afford to pay so much for juvenile evaluations, DeVizia said.
“The challenge will be getting someone acceptable to the judge at a cost the county can afford,” DeVizia said.
County officials plan to issue a public request for proposals before July 1 to obtain price quotes and qualifications of all psychologists who are interested in the work now handled by Vita, DeVizia said.
The county’s 2004 purchasing policy requires public searches, but the court has not been in compliance.
County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Mark Ciavarella agreed to the public advertising but said he doesn’t believe he is legally required to comply with the county’s policy. Several county officials disagree with his interpretation.
The courts should have embraced a public advertising process, particularly when Conahan served as president judge from 2002 through 2006, said county minority Commissioner Stephen A. Urban. The president judge oversees probation and other court branches.
“The fact that Mr. Vita is Judge Conahan’s brother-in-law raises a big red flag,” Urban said Wednesday.
Conahan and Vita have not responded to requests for comment. Ciavarella has said he supports Vita’s work because he does thorough, quality reports.
Urban said he learned Wednesday that commissioners were never asked to approve a contract for Vita to work for probation, even though other probation contracts routinely come before commissioners.
“Why was this contract handled differently?” Urban asked.
According to Vita’s invoices, he usually bills between 14 and 19 hours for work associated with each juvenile. For example, his $14,805 payment on April 2 covered assessments for 10 juveniles.
His referrals come from the county’s Juvenile Probation Department, according to county Probation Director Larry Saba.
The probation “forensic department” run by Sandy Brullo determines which juvenile offenders receive psychological evaluations, Saba said.
Those evaluations usually involve several tests, according to Vita’s bills. For most clients, he indicates that he performed the following tests: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Bender Gestalt Visual Motor Test, Rorschach Scoring and Interpretation and the Million Adolescent Clinical Inventory Scoring and Interpretation.
“…(I)t is a specialty service, and it has to be looked at as a specialty.”Joe DeVizia
Luzerne County Human Services Director

Group alleges hundreds of county youths denied lawyers

A fun destination is awaiting you, Lovely Luzerne County in the picturesque Allegheny mountains of Pennsylvania. Where lawlessness is a way of life. Come and tour or Judicial system and be amazed by how it slaps the face of the Keystone state. This is the state where the Declaration of Independence and the bill of Rights were signed yet you would never know it by the way the courts operate there.

Group alleges hundreds of county youths denied lawyers
By Terrie Morgan-Besecker tmorgan@timesleader.comLaw & Order Reporter
WILKES-BARRE – Alleging youths are being denied their right to an attorney, a juvenile rights group Tuesday filed a petition asking the state Supreme Court to intervene in hundreds of past and current Luzerne County juvenile court cases.
An attorney for the Juvenile Law Center in Philadelphia said the center was prompted to act after research showed that 50 percent of youths who went through Luzerne County’s juvenile court system in 2005 and 2006 were not represented by an attorney – a figure the center says is 10 times the state average.
The failure to provide even the “most minimal” constitutional protections to those youths resulted in many making admissions of guilt without fully understanding their legal rights or the consequences, said Marsha Levick, the center’s legal director and one of the authors of the petition.
“Luzerne County’s juvenile court proceedings represent the most egregious violation of children’s constitutional rights in Pennsylvania,” Levick said. “When more than half of all youth appear in court without legal representation ... something is seriously wrong and it must be stopped.”
The petition was filed on behalf of two juveniles who went through the court system in 2007, as well as all juveniles with current cases.
It alleges the county’s juvenile judge, Mark Ciavarella, and juvenile probation officials have failed to follow regulations that require juveniles be advised they have a right to an attorney.
The petition further alleges court officials violated state regulations by allowing parents to waive a child’s right to counsel without the child’s consent, and that Ciavarella has failed to question youths who entered guilty pleas to ensure they understand the ramifications of proceeding without an attorney.
The center is asking the court to vacate decisions made in all cases dating from 2005 to present in which the juvenile was not represented by an attorney. It has identified 285 cases from 2005, and 281 from 2006. The number of cases in 2007 and 2008 is not yet known.
Ciavarella acknowledged Tuesday that a high percentage of youths who come before him are not represented by attorneys. He could not explain why the numbers were so much higher than other counties.
The judge said in many cases he believes parents opt not to obtain attorneys because they know their child is guilty.
He insisted parents are advised at every step of the process that their child is entitled to an attorney, and that one will be appointed if they cannot afford one.
“It’s not like they’re walking into this blind. They are advised on three different occasions they have a right to have a lawyer present,” Ciavarella said. “If they want waive their right to an attorney, that’s their business.”
The center’s petition is based on the cases Jessica Van Reeth, now 18, and a female identified as H.T., now 17.
Van Reeth was 16 when she was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia. She and her parents allege they were never advised of her right to an attorney. She admitted guilt and was placed in a residential treatment facility for three months, even though it was her first involvement with police.
H.T. was charged with harassment in April 2007 for creating a Web page that contained derogatory information about an assistant principal at her school.
The girl, also a first-time offender, admitted her actions, was immediately carted off in handcuffs to begin serving a three months at a residential treatment facility.
The child’s mother acknowledged waiving the child’s right to an attorney, but the youth did not sign the waiver, as regulations require. The mother also claimed the child was never questioned to ensure she understood the potential consequences of entering a plea without first consulting an attorney, the petition says.
Ultimately, the child was returned home a few weeks later after the Juvenile Law Center intervened on her behalf and convinced Ciavarella to release her, based on the fact the child had not waived her right to an attorney.
Levick said the center felt at that point the issue was resolved. Since then, there have been at least three other cases in which juveniles alleged they were not afforded an opportunity for counsel, she said.
“When we got (H.T.’s) adjudication reversed we thought we wouldn’t have to do it again,” she said. “As we collected information over the next several moths, we realized we had made no difference. It apparently will take extraordinary action and extraordinary intervention by the Supreme Court to fix this.”
What’s Next
Ciavarella said he has contacted the attorney for the county’s juvenile probation department, who will file a response to the petition. The Supreme Court will review the documents and decide whether it will intervene.
Terrie Morgan-Besecker, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 570-829-7179

Luzerne county up to it's little secret tricks again

The Times Leader is a interesting read, they will tell all of the dirty little secrets of Luzerne County. I wonder if Judge Conahan got a kickback from his brother-in-law for all of the county work he got him?

Judge’s brother-in-law paid $877K
Psych services to court not bid out
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.comLuzerne County Reporter
A Luzerne County judge’s brother-in-law has been paid $877,880 to provide psychological services to the court system since 2004, raising questions about why that work isn’t publicly advertised.

The psychologist, Frank Vita, is married to the sister of Mike Conahan, who is now a senior judge in the county Court of Common Pleas.
Psychology is considered a professional service by county officials.

The county’s 2004 purchasing policy requires public requests for proposals or qualifications for professional services over $7,500. The mandate is meant to give everyone a shot at the work and to gather cost comparisons, though there’s no requirement that the work will go to the individual or business that submits the lowest price.

Common Pleas President Judge Mark Ciavarella said he wasn’t aware of the county purchasing policy and has been abiding by the state County Code, which does not require public advertising for professional services.

Requests-for-proposals will be sought for the psychology service in the future, said county Chief Clerk/Manager Doug Pape.
Ciavarella said he has no problem advertising the psychology work, but he stressed that he does not believe the court is required to abide by the county’s purchasing policy.

“The court is a separate branch of government. They (commissioners) can’t dictate how I manage the court system, as long as I am in compliance with the state law,” Ciavarella said.
But Commissioners Stephen A. Urban and Maryanne Petrilla believe the courts must follow the county policy.

Urban said $877,880 is a lot of money to pay someone without shopping around for the prices and qualifications of other providers.
Petrilla said she knows of no county document or state law that exempts the courts from following county purchasing policies.

“Since the county is the funding source for the courts, and their budget is approved by the commissioners, I see no reason why they don’t follow all county policies,” Petrilla said.
Vita and Conahan could not be reached for comment.
Ciavarella said Vita “does an outstanding job.” Vita assesses juvenile offenders and recommends appropriate treatment to the judge. Ciavarella has been handling juvenile court cases in the county for years.

“When I first got on the bench, I received psychological reports that were not worth the paper they were printed on. His reports are 10 and 20 pages long and very extensive,” Ciavarella said.
Vita typically spends 10 to 16 hours evaluating each juvenile offender, Ciavarella said.
“In the juvenile system, it’s so important to get the child in the right program. Without that, we’re just wasting our money,” Ciavarella said.

Vita started providing psychology services to the court system when Joseph Augello was president judge, said county Probation Director Larry Saba.
Conahan then served as president judge from 2002 through 2006 until Ciavarella took over the role. The president judge decides who is hired in court branches and oversees the court’s administrative affairs.

The controller’s office did not have records on Vita’s payments before 2004.
Here’s the breakdown of what Vita was paid: $233,705 in 2004; $189,495 in 2005; $200,160 in 2006; $180,360 in 2007 and $74,160 this year to date.
Purchasing has become an issue in the county since the recent discovery that prison kitchen purchases were illegally piecemealed, or broken into smaller amounts to circumvent requirements to obtain quotes and/or bids.

County officials have started visiting each department and discovered other examples of purchases that did not comply with the county’s purchasing policy.
Jennifer Learn-Andes, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 831-7333.

I wonder if they did the psych evaluation on Joe Kerekes as well as Bryan Kocis in his first case? It really makes you woinder what is going on in Luzerne County.

PC is on a mission

Well it looks like PC is on a mission to cause problems for me. What I find interesting is that he himself asked me to keep our conversations private which I did. I never posted any of our conversations on my blog yet he has done exactly what he asked me not to do.

Well I have all of our conversations archived as well as all of the emails but I choose not to post them. To me it seems that he is just a bit pissed off at me for some stupid reason. My blog is a place for me to say what I want to say about how I feel about this murder case and his is his place to do the same.

What I find funny is that he is now attacking me for my opinion. He claims that I don't have proof to back up the comments that I have made but I know who his source was in Virginia Beach court system. I also know that he was informed by this source on who to contact in the Luzerne County Court system. I have this in PC's own words in comments that he made to me.

So I guess he is now going to play nasty. That really is to bad because I don't think it is that important to destroy someone with their own words and I won't go there unless I am pushed.

this is Elmysterio and I'm out.

Prodigy Pictures is on the rise.

Brent Corrigan AKA Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy have finally got a good business partner to help them Get there company Prodgy Pictures off the ground. With the new infusion of cash and expertise they seem to be on they're way to a successful venture. I Have been a fan of Dink Flamingo for quite sometime and I can see that he is going to help Sean and Grant achieve what they have been trying to achieve for quite sometime.

No thanks to Lee bergeron and all of the others who have tried to destroy his asperations Sean has made two new videos the Porne Ultimatum and Brent Corrigans Summit and they are both due to be relesed this month if all goes well. I have also read on his web-site that he is soon to be in paradise filming his next epic. I have not seen his first effort and don't really know if I will but I do wish him the best of luck. It has been a rough couple of years for him.

I just thought that I would get the truth out there before the Internet Maggot got his smelly fingers all over it. Seems he is setting up a new big lie to tell the world but we all know he does not know a damn thing about this.

This is Elmysterio and I'm out.

The 385

With 385 potential witnesses who seem to be at the beck and call of the prosecution in the Kocis case willing to testify to the whereabouts of Joe Kerekes on the night of January 24th 2007. It would seem that Joe does not stand a chance at defending himself against the allegations that he is charged with. It would appear that Luzerne County has him dead to rights. I guess Joe was on Bryan’s web cam and this can be proven by the prosecution. You know the same web cam that Robert Wagner witnessed Bryan’s murder on. It is really to bad that the desk clerk at the hotel could not ID Joe at the preliminary hearing.

As for his criminal record it would appear that Joe is a bad driver and he should be kept off the road, as he is a serial speeder with tinted windows. Harlow’s criminal record is just as bad as Joe’s is with the exception that Harlow is a serial masseuse. With Joe and Harlow’s serious criminal records it seems that what the prosecution claims would be a stretch. But the prosecution seems to think that two people who have no record of violent crime would travel to Pennsylvania and commit this crime unprovoked. The police claim that this is the motive."Investigators claim the two Virginia men killed Kocis, their rival in the gay porn industry, inside his home and then set the house on fire. Kocis, 44, was found dead by firefighters".

Some seem to think that Joe and Harlow had a large debt load that this was a good reason for them to commit this crime. They also feel that Joe and Harlow thought that Sean Lockhart would be their financial savior. These same people seem to think that Joe and Harlow were under the impression that getting Sean to work for their web-site would help them make a wad of cash. This I find interesting because Joe and Harlow would have to produce a video with Sean and get it distributed to make this wad of cash. A video that would take weeks to months to get put on the market and it is not even a sure thing that anyone would really even want to see it.
For the record Harlow has never publicly admitted he was at Bryan’s house and from what we have been told the police have no solid evidence to prove otherwise. As far as public statements made by Harlow there really have not been any. As far as we know the only thing that says that Harlow was ever at Bryan’s house are the Blacks Beach tapes. From what I gather from the comments on the blogs is that Harlow is a known liar. So I guess we can not believe anything that he says. This is proven in the letters that he sent to Damon and the alibi that he claimed he had. So why would you believe what he said on those beach tapes?

The prosecution seems to be a little pissed off that Harlow finally has a good attorney and now they want to take that away from him by filing this latest motion. Funny thing is that it would seem that Joe’s attorneys would be the ones filing this motion not the prosecution. I guess the prosecution wants to make sure that Joe has a fair trial. It makes you wonder what Melnick is thinking. Is he that scared that his reputation will be smeared again by Fannick. You would think that with 385 potential witnesses Melnick would have a sure thing when it comes to a guilty verdict. But I guess they want the state of Pennsylvania to foot the bill for Harlow's attorney? Maybe so they can wrap this up in a nice little package like they did with the other case that concerned Bryan Kocis.

With all of the evidence that the prosecution is claiming you would think that they would not resort to dirty tricks but I guess that just shows that the case against Joe and Harlow is not as strong as they are claiming. As far as I am concerned the case is not as clear-cut as some would think. With all of the evidence that it would seem that Sean Lockhart had against Bryan I find it strange that Bryan was not arrested. If Sean went to the FBI on the four occasions that I was told of why did they not take any action against him. With the email threats and the civil suit and all of the other underhanded things that Bryan did to Sean and Grant it would seem that they would have taken Sean’s accusations seriously.

It is clear that Bryan wanted to control Sean and make his life a living hell. That has been proven with the backdoor deal between he and Lee Bergeron. Bryan went as far as to get a separate Cobra Video just to file the civil suit against Sean and Grant. It appears that Bryan seemed to have some sort of hold on the FBI for them not to take Sean’s case seriously. Bryan also must have had some sort of hold over the head of the Luzerne County Judicial system as well for his prior case to be basically dismissed. Why would Judge Connahan not require him to register as a sex offender when he videotaped himself having sex with a 15 year-old boy?

The defense that Bryan used was that the boy lied to him about his age. Bryan also claimed he was going to use the 15 year-old in a video for his company. He claimed that he filmed him and he "forgot" to get the boys ID. Which I might add it is against the law to film a model without having valid records of the age of the model on file (US 2257). But apparently that never stopped Bryan before. By the way all of these claims were made against a company that at the time did not even exist. There are several people who would have a valid reason to kill Bryan Kocis as he was not a nice person. He was a gambler and a child molester and he was a liar. Who knows why he was killed the fact is that he was but it has still not been proven as to when he was killed. The Coroner can not confirm time of death, just how he was killed. They are still not even positive as to the murder weapon.

I have been accused of all types of things with regards to this case. Funny thing is most of the stuff that I have been accused of saying is stuff that I have read in the newspapers. So I guess I am using a bad resource for my information. But I was told that the newspapers were a good source information. You know with all of the things that I am accused of saying I just find it funny that some are trying to attribute all of this to me. I guess they are just so intent on spreading lies about everything regarding this case that they need to pin the blame on someone. Did Joe and Harlow have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. Did Sean and Grant have anything to do with this murder; that has not been proven. As far as I am concerned this is a circumstantial case and it always has been, nothing more nothing less.

This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

Gladiator Movie or Porn Movie?

The movie "300" was hot men in capes and very little else. Well all I can say is if you have not seen it you should. I’m not really into war movies but this one made up for all the fight scenes with the visually stunning wardrobe or the lack thereof. It had great action sequences and epic battles but it was hard to follow the story because of all of the eye candy that filled the screen. The acting was good from what I gathered but as I said earlier it was very hard to follow with the wind machines and flowing capes and nearly naked men with their hair blowing in every frame of this film.
The one thing that impressed me the most was that the average age of the cast was 35 years old. If you have any negative body issues I would recommend you pass this one up but if you like hot men in battle then this is a flick you will enjoy. The actors were on a grueling work out regimen for at least 6 weeks before filming started and during the 2-month shoot and it shows they're dedication to their work ethic when you see this film. If you converted all of the six-packs on those guys in this movie to beer all of the college boys in this country would be drunk. This movie reeks of a Titan porn video maybe they should do one and call it "369" or something like that.

Cause this movie had it all, big ol healthy mens all hot and sweaty from battle half naked and hot and sexy in their capes and with their big swords and hair all blowing in the wind and their heaving chests and long well muscled legs and firm round butts all squoze up in their hot tight little leather briefs. Opps another run on sentence.



The cast is an interesting mix of fairly well known actors and not so well known actors and they are all visually appealing. There is quite a bit of CGI in this movie. Most of the film was filmed on blue or Green screen and the sets were all pretty much put in on post-production but the men were real and they worked really hard to look good for us in this move and that is the most important part. It does follow the original story very well and the movie has a good flow.

The battle scenes were stunning and it was just a fun and good time had by all that watched this film. I would definitely watch it again just to pay a little more attention to the story.





This is Elmysterio and I’m out