Black helicopters

Black helicopters
It's The Black Helicopters Bitches

Monday, August 13, 2007

Spin the lies and perpetuate the hate.





The HIV testing of the models in Bare back porn is not a guarantee that the models are negative. The test only checks for antibodies. HIV tests are not conclusive and have never been. They can only tell you that you have no antibodies at the time of the test or that you do. If you are tested several times and have not participated in any risky behavior between the tests then you can consider the results accurate.
The quick test will only show that at the time of the test that you have no antibodies or that you do.

HIV is on the rise in the gay community and it is really a sad thing to say but it is true. I have been around since the beginning of the pandemic and I can say from experience that it is not something that I want to go through again. Watching so many of my friends get sick and die was not anything that I would wish on anyone. After reading the article by out magazine Barring the truth
I thought that I would do annother post on the subject.

What I find truly troubling is that the porn producers are using these young models for they’re own financial gain. There are no protections in place for these models that participate in these practices. I will not claim that all producers of Bareback porn do not take precautions but you see these models are not in a vacuum.
They have lives out side of porn and whatever sexual practices they participate in when not on camera have a direct bearing on the results of those instant HIV tests. We are talking about sexually active individuals here.
You can bad mouth a model for doing bareback porn and that is your prerogative but you also have to take into consideration that they are working for producers. The producers would not be doing this if there were no demand for the product. The demand by consumers of the product is what is driving this practice in the porn industry. And so we have the vicious circle of who is at fault? So to single out a single model or a producer is not going to help the situation. What the real issue is why would someone want to watch two young men potentially risk their health and possibly they’re lives for your sexual gratification.

There is plenty of bareback porn out there from before we knew the risks involved. Just go do an Internet search and I’m sure you can find it. But here is the deal do a check on the models who were in those videos and you will be surprised to see that 75% of them are dead and they died before they turned 40 years old. Now that is sad but it is true.
I have personally known quite a few of the models and I miss them. They were fun and full of life and they are gone because we did not know any better. We do know better now but that still has not stopped the producers from producing this product. Maybe the warnings are not strong enough or the risks are not stressed enough. Another sad fact is that many of the modles who are participating in this type of filming are positive as well. Maybe there needs to be legislation enacted. No one can perform Bareback on film or video until they are 25 years old. That would slow down the producers of this product a bit.
The producers seem to be taking advantage of these young and na├»ve men. Most of use did not have a clue at eighteen and many people still don’t.
Intelligence does not equate experience and it is not exclusive of the other. The fact that you are not that experienced in life has nothing to do with the fact that someone is intelligent.

We look to our elders for guidance and if that person is only in this for himself or herself then you can be easily mislead.



This is Elmysterio and I’m out.

39 comments:

  1. Good post Elm. What's disturbing is when other bloggers have a theory and make a new observation, which means they then have to add new components. But they're not connected. There's no reason to add them, and no particular reason to add them in the particular sequence of events claimed by other bloggers. The question is how much they're explaining and how much they're engineering an ever changing model that fits their already decided conclusions.

    Especially about poz and neg and barebacking.

    Is it true that Brent Everett is poz?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is it true that Brent Everett is poz?
    I would not know the answer to that. I don't believe so but and I do not know him so I can say not yes or no to that question. Why don't you ask him yourself. As to the other models listed on this post I can confirm that Lance Chislom, Ron Pearson and Jon King are Dead and they were positive, they were my friends and I miss them. Ashton Ryan is positive and as for the other models I do not know they're HIV status. I will also say that it is not really any of our business as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have you seen this from Adam Mason at BM?

    http://www.blakemason.com/masonsdiary.php

    Apparently every time the bareback issue arises on the site revenues dip by as much as 40% due to BM's firm stand against bareback scenes.

    There's a personal level to this at BM. Leo M is a model there who has in the past done bareback scenes for other studios and is HIV+. Adam Mason included the announcement of Leo's status given by Lucas at the end of their amazing vid together, in a very moving message that actually brought tears to my eye.

    If more companies take the same principled stand as BM, then everyone will be safer, free from insidious pressure by producers to take risks with their health.

    Personally I can't now in good conscience watch bareback porn with young men risking all, under the false reassurance of these tests, when they are too young fully to understand the consequences, and vulnerable to exploitation.

    As you say, there's plenty of very hot classic pre-condom era porn out there, though yes, it is so sad how many of the performers are sadly no longer around.

    It bothers me too when some sites that have straight as well as gay output operate a double standard by which models in gay scenes wear condoms while those shooting het sex don't, including tag teams with two guys and one girl, including anal penetration of the woman by both males.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jon said...
    Good post Elm. What's disturbing is when other bloggers have a theory and make a new observation, which means they then have to add new components. But they're not connected. There's no reason to add them, and no particular reason to add them in the particular sequence of events claimed by other bloggers. The question is how much they're explaining and how much they're engineering an ever changing model that fits their already decided conclusions.

    Especially about poz and neg and barebacking.

    Is it true that Brent Everett is poz?
    August 13, 2007 1:50 PM


    FYI: This comment is from Damon Kruezer. He also posted a similar comment on BB’s blog. He is using a new alias to try and fool the blog reading public. He is asking the question about Brent Everett because he will soon be attacking him. Just so you all know Brent Everett only performed Bareback porn with his then boyfriend Chase Mackenzie. And that is the only person that I have ever seen him perform bareback with. This is just to stop the nasty rumors that Damon is trying to start. As far as the post on BB’s blog it is just another attack on Sean Lockhart by Bryan’s henchmen. BB’s post is bashing Sean for doing bareback porn yet he is trying to canonize Bryan for producing and directing bareback porn. BB you can not have it both ways. It is either wrong or it’s not so what is it BB?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yup it is Damien [that is what I call him -like the devil] who is placing those Brent Everett bullshit posts. He posted another on bb's blog saying it was true [Brent E-positive] it is all more Damien lies.

    ReplyDelete
  6. VJ you are aware that we are dealing with psychotics. Damon and all of his different personas are just out to spread more hate and lies. He is trying to start a fight with Brent C and Brent E. but we know that he is just a shit disturber like another blogger who I will not name. They are spreading their hate to anyone who is so weak minded that they will believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you, elm, that is a great post. I am sorry to read that you lost so many friends.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Damon and all of his different personas are just out to spread more hate and lies. He is trying to start a fight with Brent C and Brent E."

    As you all know, I dislike commenting on DK as a matter of principle (I think it's a waste of time), but this I have to say this is a new low, even by his standards.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "What's disturbing is when other bloggers have a theory and make a new observation, which means they then have to add new components. But they're not connected. There's no reason to add them, and no particular reason to add them in the particular sequence of events claimed by other bloggers. The question is how much they're explaining and how much they're engineering an ever changing model that fits their already decided conclusions." Senseless drivel from Kent Barclay. Then you see his malicious attack on Brent Everett all attempting to divert attention from himself and to try and do damage to someone else. Brent Everett's status is his business not your Kent. What about the pictures Kent? Again mis-representing yourself? Imagine how absurd it is to hear you chime in to an HIV discussion when for years now you have been championing the lunatic (Let's see if I can take 100 loads in a night) Jeff Palmer. Why because he is about the only person crazy enough to talk with you. Now he has aligned himself with BB not because he agrees with him remember Kent has no moral compass,(how else could you explain putting your own mother's life at risk to hide in a welfare motel room from a process server)but because BB is the only person left who allows him to post. Try and figure out what the Israeli government building settlements has to do with any of these discussions... He is obviously getting desperate, he has manufactured this Marc character to do what he has done so many times before. He feels he has more power and can inflict more fear if you not only have to deal with him but his nameless and faceless"associates". Remember "The LA people are on my side now" haha. The other reason is too deflect responsibility when someone comes after him. This is what we at the Truth Squad call the Nathanial Ragsdale syndrome. It is what Kent does when the heat from his lies gets too hot and he then sells his site and says he is going to take the fortune he got for the site and go somewhere exoitc. That explains part of the Marc personna. Things are true if they come from 2 people, one of them that does not exist. The other side of the Marc Syndrome is the need Kent has to act like he is loved. That he is desirable, and that he lives a life that is enviable. That is what most of this is about. The truth is is is s fat, bald, toothless, nasty 57 YO unemployed man who lives off his 84 YO mothers Social Security. In his latest lie he actually embarrassed himself to the world with Mark Adams. How humiliating. Just weeks ago he was going to testify for the defense now he is bad mouthing the defendants. Why? because he once believed them and now doesn't? No for the same reason he went after Brent Corrigon and countless others. As soon as they figure him out they realize he has been lying to them. they leave and he turns on them. Just last week he was moving away from Bryan Kocis saying thins like he told him to cease and desist etc., in an attempt to ingratiate himself with the defense. That obviously did not work so he is back to Bryan RIP and after Sean and Grant to appease BB as BB is the only one who allows him to post. Well Kent you are on a greased rope with no knot at end. It must be very disillusioning that you thought you had the pot of gold and you have zip. What did you expect? Did you think the hundreds of people you have slandered over the years were going to let you off the hook? Not a chance. If I may I have a suggestion for you. When you come to the end of that greased rope have Babs underneath you. Now we know that it is normally you underneath her and her MATT RUSH dildo strapped on, but try switching for once.SIT ON IT AND SPIN KENT!

    ReplyDelete
  10. well said Sethj. It would appear that Damian Luezer is a failed cause. he has no moral comapss and no idea that he is as disliked as he really is. he changes direction on a daily basdis to try and appease anyone who he thinks might further his agenda. what is great is that all of his lies are now coming back to bit him in the ass. and its a big fat flabby ass ann thre are alot of lies to bite it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting that Dexx Jones appears to be the person behind the phony baloney civil suit that named Kruezer along with a lot of others last summer. It got thrown out on lack of merit. As if providing a link to a site owned by someone else makes you responsible for what's on that other website? Puh-leeze.

    Other posters, let me ask you - is that a valid basis for a Federal suit? Whether you like La Kruz or hate him, there's just a very basic 1st amendment issue here.

    This is where the haters like Sethj and Mark Adams under his other names keep talking about the process server last year. Significant they don't mention the followup which is the suit was frivolous and was simply an abuse of the system and has been dismissed. Apparently Jones thought it would finish Kruezer off but he was wrong again.

    Now wait and see Jones come back with one of his bombastic put-downs and repeat his drivel again.
    Yes he was heavily involved with Kruezer but when Kruezer showed him he wasn't willing to be his bitch Jones turned on him. What does this tell us?

    Ditto the FBI informant Murray aka Mark Adams. Oh what a can of worms THAT one is...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't see where Kruezer stated he visited Adams store recently. All he said was "last time in Boston" whenever that was.

    For people who like to jump on him for every little thing, you are drawing an unwarranted conclusion.

    I just heard MORE about how Murray aka Mark Adams is going to be written about BIG TIME in relation to the FBI. Seems there is some well documented material someone has been archiving for years. It seems the store was sold/closed because of some very questionable videos Adams had there.

    Does the name AARON ring a bell anyone? Last name begins with an L or so I hear...

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Significant they don't mention the followup which is the suit was frivolous and was simply an abuse of the system and has been dismissed."

    This seems unlikely to me.

    Knowing the DK modus operendi, any such dismissal would have been scanned, and then posted triumphantly to his blog. The fact that this has NOT happened is proof to me no such dismissal exists.

    Or perhaps you have a case file number, which would permit others to independantly fact check this, "Matthew?"

    If not I hereby dismiss "Matthew's" tale here as pure bovine scatology.

    ReplyDelete
  14. mathew aka damon aka Damien aka marc aka jon aka voodoo hipster aka john ragazzi aka troy halston aka on and on and on.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kent/Matthew you are so predictable. You lie so much that you can't keep up with them. Perhaps we should remind you that you LIVE in Massachusetts? Even if one were to believe your lies last week you claimed to have been in Boston where Mark Wahlberg recognized you from your DNA article. Remember? Seems that a week ago was well within the the three months the store was closed. Now please go back and re-read what I said. If you know the store was closed you would have said all kind of things about the closing now here you go. You imply things with no proof. The first amendment does not cover lies Kent, there is no first amendment issue with you. There is no end to how pathetic you are but there is an end to you getting away with lying. Have you noticed you are called on them almost as fast as they leave your keyboard? Why not take a moment and tell us about why you took the pictures of Damon and Marc off your site? Did you explain to Channel 13 why you sent them one pic and are using another? Lies from a piece of shit...

    ReplyDelete
  16. He is from Massachusetts. His senators or Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Enough said.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Elm

    Just wanted to say hi and say how much this whole bareback thing disturbs me. I really don't see how people can defend it.

    Does this mean that if you want to produce high-quality twink porn these days you're doomed to failure if you use condoms? Are 'safe' studios (i.e. Hyde Park & Citiboyz) making any money? Anybody know?

    -Nick

    ReplyDelete
  18. Please use the former damon fan blog to discuss that piece of trash. www.yvesmignon.blogspot.com. that would be muc appriciated, Thank you. I am going to remove any further comment from the trash monger. the subject can be discussed at length on the other site.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I would think porn would make money as long as it is good. For the most part the gay porn industry is populated by "straight guys" who are gay for pay. That does not make for hot porn, what is hot is when you have models who are actually hot for each other. If the main reason for the model is the cash it will truly show in the scenes that are shot. so I will say good porn will make money and bad porn won't, it really is that simple.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hmmm, seems one of my comments on another blog touched a nerve...a certain other blogger got his panties in SUCH a binder that he had to start an ENTIRE new thread just to deal with a comment by little ole ***moi***.

    LOL! :oD I LOVE IT!!!

    In all modesty tho, I just CANNOT take credit...no, the credit goes to the guy who actually wrote the old email I quoted...so, if the bb/DK alliance has a problem with that email...I suggest you take it up with the one who actually wrote hat email.

    Using a Ouiji Board of course! LOL!!! :oD

    ReplyDelete
  22. But you know what? I am going to credit bb with something good. Look at the last sentence of his last post:

    "They have blood on their hands, and that cannot be washed away by crocodile tears from a bareback twink porn actor who lied about his age to get into the industry, just so he could fuck on-camera. "

    Yep! You read it RIGHT! bb FINALLY, PUBLICALLY, and IRRETRACTABLY admits Brent was underage!

    So, credit where credit is due...bb finally admits to the truth!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi Elm.
    I hate bareback porn. But it sells, sells, sells. I've been thinking about banning it from my blogs, and getting rid of sponsors who sell it.

    What say you?

    Wild

    ReplyDelete
  24. W. West said...
    Hi Elm.
    I hate bareback porn. But it sells, sells, sells. I've been thinking about banning it from my blogs, and getting rid of sponsors who sell it.

    What say you?

    Wild

    That is your call I have stated my view on the subject and I would no force my opinions on you.
    I personally don't feel that it can be a safe proposition for the models. The risk are just to high in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I think "W. West" is Damian.

    ReplyDelete
  26. V.J. said...
    I think "W. West" is Damian.

    August 20, 2007 9:41 AM


    You could not be more wrong. I have spoken to him and I can attest that he is not Damian.

    ReplyDelete
  27. W. West you are on the horns of a dilemma. The industry is moving in that direction as the numbers of gay men getting HIV keeps rising. While it is your decision think about it the next time you hear about a 18-19 YO getting HIV.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Elm I must say you have been uncharacteristically quiet this past week. Not to mention the past 24 hours.

    Any commentary on recent events? I am particularly interested in your opinion of Justin Hansley.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well to tell you the truth not much new has been said. I have been aware of most of the evidece for quit sometime. Fact is the motel clerk could not identify Joe. He could only verify that his Id was used and that he rented a room. The neighbors who testified that they saw the rented vehicle could only approximate the times that they saw it. As for as Robert Wagner is concerned did he tour the burned out home after the fact? How does he know what was missing after the fire? was he there on the night of the murder? That was not really gone over in the newspapers. Justin Hainsley is one of the 2 informnants who worked with Joe and Harlow and he is probably working under a deal with the Virginia police to avoid being charged as a prostitute. I am not sure if he is the one who is the son of the police official.
    So in responce to your questions about my silence, I will let the police and the courts do they're jobs and leave it at that. There are peoples lives at stake here and I will not be a party to this online lynching any more. If I have information to share I will do so but I will not make comments unless that is the case.

    ReplyDelete
  30. If by "online lynching" you mean being accused of this murder, then not only do we have Harlow and Joe as "lynchees" in recent past, but also Grant, Brent, Aaron, bb, DeWayne, Albert and Lee.

    And perhaps others I'm forgetting. In any case, as you see, there have been at least the 9 people above accused of involvement in this murder, and hence, being "lynched" online.

    And with that expanded list, practically everyone here has been a "lyncher" of somebody, including you, Elm.

    My point being, one person's lynching can easily be seen as another person's "search for the truth."

    ReplyDelete
  31. Jim I would agree with you on that. That is why I chosen to not post unless it is pertinenet to the case.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Damon has posted another lie on his blog about me being under a gag order. Now that is quite interesting when he has no connection to this case other than his fabricated tales and the fake interview he did with Harlow. His sources for information are my blog and PC's blog. What I also find funny is that if he gets us taken down as he claims that he is about to do he will have no more sources for his exclusive information. Damon you are a idiot and the whole world knows it so why don't you just admit it? No one is allowing you to post on they're blogs anymore because you are a idiot and you are just making things up as you go. The whole story about Justin Hainsley, you got that here and you did not even quote it correctly. You can back date your post all you want but it will not make the story yours.

    ReplyDelete
  33. BB said...
    so elm has decided to no longer try this case and let the courts decide ROFLMAO.

    the stupid old fool has finally realized how much of a puppet he was.

    the pervs allburp, depain and their various aliases have shut up too... not one of their lies has come true. interesting they no longer make accusations.

    anyone with information on elm, depain and allburp, please contact me. i am particularly interested in details of depain and allburps interest in underage boys. all sources are confidential.

    August 22, 2007 3:18 AM


    BB you and your harpies are all hysterical little assholes. You can all fuck off as far as I am concerned and you can't do anything to me if you wanted to. So kiss my round black ass you stupid little self serving little bitch.

    You will find out soon enough how wrong you are in all of this. Bryan was just as culpable in the porn he produced as the models. You never seem to say anything about your precious Robert who also preformed Bareback for Bryan or all of the other models who did as well.

    You just shout the samething over and over cobrakiller this and cobrakiller that and it is getting really tiresome. That is why I have not sad anything in the last couple of days because it really does not matter what you or I think, it is past all of that now it is in the hands of the judicial system now.

    So deal with it. You keep praying that you are right about Sean And Grant because you have made such a stink for the last seven months you now have to save face. Well face it BB you are wrong and it will all be proven soon enough.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Toxicology reports do not indicate that Bryan was drugged and his blood alcohol level was .035 so he was not drunk either .08 being the legal limit for intoxication. The coroner also stated that the murder weapon was not a serrated instrument as first reported. It was a very sharp knife or cutting instrument was what he said in court under cross. They did find a knife at the crime scene but have not ascertained if it was the murder weapon. It was bagged as evidence by the police when the fire department discovered it and it also had a serrated edge so it goes against the testimony of the coroner if it was the murder weapon. The fire chief testified that the fire was started behind the loveseat with a cushion form the couch and that no accelerates were used. Robert Wagner testified that when Bryan asked him what he thought of Harlow, he told Bryan that he did not think that Harlow was all that cute. It would appear that Robert Wagner was there on the night Bryan was killed because he was walked through the house and he told the police what was missing. So he was in the area on the night of the murder.

    Justin Hainsley’s testimony was pretty much ripped to shreds, as all he did was comment on the fact that Joe and Harlow wanted to hire Sean and what kind of lavish life style they lead. As far as the witnesses who said that they saw the rented SUV they could not confirm the color or the make or model of the vehicle and they were not even sure of the time that they saw it. And the only picture of any SUV that they were shown was like the on Joe and Harlow rented. As far as the hotel clerk goes he could only confirm that he had Joe’s ID and that he rented a room and he could not Identify Joe in the courtroom. All he had was a description of the vehicle and no license plate. This is just a bit of the information that I was told by a source that was at the hearing.

    Oh and Grant did not testify on Monday. He will most likely testify as to the content of the beach tapes on Thursday. As far as Sean Lockhart goes Damon says he is in an undisclosed location in Pennsylvania being coached on his testimony. Are we to really believe that?


    OH yeah Damon Gag on this Bitch

    ReplyDelete
  35. Elm
    What about the Gag Order...

    ReplyDelete
  36. What gag order? Oh you mean the one that Damon created? I broke that gag order because Damon has no power to shut me up. He is a lying snake in the grass and he has no credibilty what so ever and he to can kiss my round black ass.

    ReplyDelete